0, 2011 1:09 AM
To: Auleta, Michael
Subject: Re: [Samba] net join & DNS
Hello there, you need to remove '--with-dns-update' which is a compile
option.
2011/7/28 Auleta, Michael
Is there an option to the net command to not have it update DNS in AD?
We are joining servers using
Is there an option to the net command to not have it update DNS in AD?
We are joining servers using the net ads join command and it's changing
our static DNS entries to dynamic ones which then get deleted when AD
does its DNS scavenging. It seems that dynamically updating DNS is the
default.
The
This addressed exactly what I was trying to accomplish. Rid mapping is
your friend for this.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Masterson [mailto:andrew.master...@nuvistaenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:54 PM
To: Javier Conti
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; Auleta, Michael
Subject
ssage-
From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:23 PM
To: EXT-Auleta, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT-Auleta, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 5:10 PM
To: EXT-Auleta, Michael
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Apostrophes in Windows usernames (again)
Could this also be a result of bug 1221?
Mark
> I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't kn
I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know where to fix it. It
appears that scanning the
users.map file strips out the apostrophes and the Windows ID never matches:
[2004/06/01 16:23:51, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(521)
user_in_list: checking user o'brienta in list
[2004
I saw the posting for the attached issue from Dec 8, 2003 and made the changes to
smbd/password.c
and include/smb.h but am still having a problem with a user attaching to our Samba
server with an
apostrophe in his name. We use a usermap file and it looks like the apostrophe is
being stripped ou
If I have a Samba server that is part of a Windows 2000 domain and is not a domain
controller (all of our
authentication goes against a Windows 2000 box), do I need to upgrade to 3.0.4/2.2.9?
What is the interaction
between a Samba server that is part of a domain and the Windows client if all of
e members of the group owner of the directories.
-Original Message-
From: Jose Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:03 PM
To: EXT-Auleta, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Upgrade & directory permissions
What is the umask setting in the smb.
I've just upgraded the version of Samba we're running from 2.2.2 to 3.0.2a and am
seeing an issue with permissions on directories. Users can still map the shares that
are set up, but cannot access the directories within those shares. This is also not
consistent; it's not happening to all users
I've run into a situation where Samba is having problems coping. I have filesystems
on a SunCluster
that my Samba server nfs mounts and then shares to our Windows PC's. I've twice had a
situation
where if I have a failover of my cluster during production time, Samba begins to use
up all swap s
We currently are running Samba 2.2.2 on a Sun E3000 under Solaris 8 and we're seeing
very puzzling performance issues with a visualization package called VisView
Professional.
A model is made up of a number of sub-assemblies. When a user opens a model that is
stored on a Windows server, it loa
12 matches
Mail list logo
