Sorry for the top post.
If I only wanted to use ACLs to control access, and not Samba as indicated in
my OP, should I use "security = share" mode?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: TAKAHASHI Motonobu [mailto:mo...@monyo.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 2:20 AM
To: Bair
Hi,
I have a case where I only want to restrict access to SMB shares via filesystem
permissions (and POSIX ACLs). Therefore, I do not want Samba to verify
security in any way at the SMB level. If the filesystem/ACL permissions allow
access to the shared directory, so should Samba. If the fil
It's easiest to tell samba to allow everyone access to the share, and use ACL's
on the Linux filesystem to restrict access.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of lst_ho...@kwsoft.de
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:55
Hi,
I'm attempting to configure Samba 3.5 to authenticate share access via Active
Directory. I do not wish to authenticate system users against AD, only Samba
shares. I have successfully joined the server to the AD domain, with a few
errors:
$ net join -W buildel664 -U jbadmin
Enter jbadmin'
Andrew,
I think you nailed it. I was running 3.0 from RHEL5. I'm seeing much more
promising results so far with 3.6.
Thanks,
Josh
From: Andrew Bartlett [abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 5:25 PM
To: Baird, Josh
Cc:
Hi,
I'm struggling to get squid+ntlm_auth working correctly. I have successfully
joined the domain, and I am able to successfully enumerate groups and users
using wbinfo. I can also successfully run "wbinfo -a."
However, once I configure Squid to use ntlm_auth per:
auth_param ntlm program