> So I guess the mailing list "General questions regarding Samba" would be
> the right one?
correct
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Serando,
You seem to have misread (or missed entirely) the purpose of this mailing list,
which is:
General discussion between people interested in using or developing
Samba on hp's VMS operating system.
You seem to have a problem involving Samba and VMs, not VMS (aka OpenVMS; see
I am using a Linux smbfs client (version 3.0.25a) with a VMS Samba 2.2.8
server (20050817 + misc patches from JYC). I am periodically getting
these errors in my smbd log for this client, and when that happens, the
file that the application had open remains open indefinitely (or at
least until
John E. Malmberg wrote:
For HP Samba V3 evaluation release, it should be currently using the
CRTL utime().
That's what I figured.
DECC$EFS_FILE_TIMESTAMPS causes different fields in on an ODS-5 volume
to be exposed by the CRTL. These fields more closely track what UNIX
expects. There are
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing these in SAMBA_LOG logs?
[2005/08/26 08:53:12, 0]
DISK$SWAP:[JYC.SAMBA.SAMBA-2_2_8-SRC.SOURCE.SMBD]TRANS2.C;9:(2229)
set_delete_on_close_internal: failed to change delete on close flag for file
Dymax/020005/VIM2E.tmp
[2005/08/26 08:53:21, 0]
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 10:44 -0300, BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
If a different user tries to edit the same file, the error is not
thrown. When I try to get the first user to edit the same file again,
the error persists, and more error messages are logged in their log
file.
Just to clarify
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:01 -0400, Robert F. Thomas wrote:
Without knowing the various user's rights and the various protections and
ACL's no reasonable response is possible.
For example one user can have RWED access and another only RW access, i.e.
they can create files but not delete
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:02 +0200, COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote:
I think that differences 1 and 2 are caused by the fact we don't have the
exact same version of vim, and/or we do not have the exact same cream
configuration. I suggest to Ben to try with vim alone (i.e. without the
cream layer) to see
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 15:21 -0400, RR - Rod Regier wrote:
Sample files created using both DOS window and GUI, and deleted using
both DOS window and GUI.
Confirming message and file display removal occurred normally with the
GUI.
Subsequent DIR or GUI view refresh showed the file had in fact
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 13:05 +0200, COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote:
Now that I know that the problem appears only when the McAfee antivirus is
there, I could fix it.
I am sending a corrected version of the OBJ files directly to Rod, a DIFF
of the sources directly to John, and I'll include the fix in
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:19 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Help is needed at all levels of expertise.
I'd like to point out to would-be contributors that before I started
working on our issues with deploying OpenVMS Samba here at Dymaxion, I
knew absolutely nothing about the topic. I have not
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 23:25 -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
- show process/acc on the user's smbd process
show proc/acc/quota may provide mroe information.
I'll keep that in mind.
Accounting information:
Buffered I/O count:193317 Peak working set size
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 14:17 -0300, BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
We have been noticing that using MS Wordpad, COPY, or other means to
read the contents of a file, most of the time the file is successfully
retrieved, but sometimes it returns empty. This happens on a fairly
regular basis, so
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 23:38 -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Please take a look at the resulting file with a dir/full.
There needn't be a resulting (i.e. output) file for this bug to
manifest. The corruption is seen in the Perl program as the files are
being *read*, not written. Likewise with
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:40 -0300, BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
I am still trying to get familiar with this code, but I am finding
references to special handling if SAMBA detects that it is a VMS text file.
Any VMS file that is not a stream or a fixed record size file may get
corrupted
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:22 -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
The reason that I said on a write() is that I have only observed the
segmented out of order transfer on a write.
On a read, I would look for other causes. It still could be a seek()
issue. It also could be that because SAMBA
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:32 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Tcpdump, which is available for TCPIP 5.4, can read it. For example:
$ tcpdump==$sys$system:tcpip$tcpdump
$ tcpdump -vr test.cap
I do not have a LINUX system running at this time. Three years in my
new house, and I have not
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 15:59 +0200, COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote:
Another way
to say is: according to me, the WinXP vs. Linux-VMS shows dramatic
differences topic is true only when using ruby. Could someone tell me if
I am right or wrong here?
We ported the ruby script to C++. I'm in the process
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
RR - Rod Regier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- TC029
Where are these tracking numbers coming from? They do not look like SAMBA
Bugzilla numbers.
Internal only. Rolling out Samba at Dymaxion has
I have reproduced the same test results as for the ruby test program,
only this time using a C++ port of it. I saw the same samba protocol
pattern of a 1024-byte write followed by one 1-byte write after the
first 64K observed in the packet capture log, and similar performance
numbers. Please
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 18:32 -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
What version of SAMBA is running on the LINUX system?
Samba 3.0.7 + smbfs 3.0.7.
Other than that, I am not set up to take advantage of your data at the
moment. I do not have any way of reading the etherreal data.
If it is because
Hi,
I received this private reply, but there is nothing particularly private
about these recommendations. I think it is useful information to be
discussing on the list, so I have stricken the respondent's name in the
interests of privacy, and quoted it in its entirety.
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out why the bench.rb test program I included in my
previous note takes several times longer to run using a WinXP client
than a Linux client, both talking to our OpenVMS samba server. The big
picture question is, How do we tune our clients and/or server to
improve overall
Hi,
Here is an analysis of my next test, supplemental to my earlier
observations about WinXP - OpenVMS samba write performance.
If you want to skip the details and cut to the chase, it seems that both
when WinXP talks to a Linux samba server and when Linux talks to a
OpenVMS server, efficiencies
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 14:04 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Or were you looking for Windows client tuning tips?
Well, since the Linux client performance against the VMS Samba shares is
considered within an acceptable range of responsiveness relative to
performance against our Windows XP shares,
OK, now for the server end of things:
A weekend upgrade is scheduled, so here are current and after-upgrade
versions:
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 14:04 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
VMS version?
OpenVMS 7.3-1 (upgrade will bring this up to 7.3-1 on Monday).
TCPIP platform and version?
TCPIP V5.3
the truncation when I copy the file from the VMS
system to a Win2K system. Nor can I reproduce the truncation when I use
GNOME nautilus to copy the file.
Any idea what might be going wrong, here?
Ben
--
Ben Armstrong-. Medianet Development Group,
[EMAIL PROTECTED
:00:00.00
Lines printed: 0 Elapsed time: 0 00:00:00.00
%SEARCH-I-NOMATCHES, no strings matched
Ben
--
Ben Armstrong-. Medianet Development Group,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-.Dymaxion Research Limited
URL: http
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 09:14, Ben Armstrong wrote:
After upgrading the Alpha/VMS server to 2.2.8 (29-Sep-03 version) my
Linux smbfs mount (and even passwordless smbclient -L //servername) now
no longer works. Both commands always time out on the connection
attempt
It seems less and less
what I should be looking for to troubleshoot this problem? So
far as I know, none of the Windows clients are having trouble connecting
after the upgrade.
Thanks,
Ben Armstrong
--
Ben Armstrong-. Medianet Development Group,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-.Dymaxion
outside of my comfort
zone. Is there any evidence this would make a difference for
Samba/VMS? Also, given that an adequate explanation has already been
given for why this is expected behaviour with smbfs + Samba/VMS 2.2.8, I
have my doubts that it would help.
Ben
--
Ben Armstrong
would not be worth bothering my sys admin to try unless
it seemed likely that it would help. But I'll keep it in mind if more
promising alternatives don't turn up.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Armstrong-. Medianet Development Group,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-.Dymaxion
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 11:17, Ben Armstrong wrote:
I will be first downgrading smbfs to see if this is only a bug in my
bleeding-edge version on not. Any other suggestions would be
appreciated.
I have downgraded my smbfs to a much earlier, stable release: 2.2.3a and
can still reproduce
33 matches
Mail list logo
