This is not the whole truth. With smbclient command line tool I have
the same exact problem (max 3,8MB/s).
b.
On 9 February 2010 17:19, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:25:44AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 01:19:40AM +0100, Bostjan Sku
know of? Compile time options? Compiler version?
Thanks again,
b.
On 9 February 2010 00:32, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Bostjan Skufca put forth on 2/8/2010 4:07 PM:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> "We have a bidder at 7,5 MB/s, do I hear more? Do we have 8 MB/s?" :)
>
> 8.5MB/s
Thanks!
"We have a bidder at 7,5 MB/s, do I hear more? Do we have 8 MB/s?" :)
b.
On 8 February 2010 21:27, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
>> Ok, a quick questions for everyone:
>>
>> Can you max a 100M
On 7 February 2010 19:53, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
> My case is slightly different. Only 2 combinations are interesting
> when compared:
> 1. WinXXX client ---> smbd (max)
> 2. smbclient ---> smbd (1/3)
>
> The first combo maxes the wire with only 1 client conne
I believe the OP wants a solution for his variation of config which
should work but it does not.
I can only share my experience with upgrade to version 3.4.5. It was a
test upgrade so I did not log every change I did on server. However I
was receiving the same error and I did the following:
1. Ad
0, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Jeremy Allison put forth on 2/6/2010 11:07 PM:
>> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:26:32PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Bostjan Skufca put forth on 2/6/2010 6:14 PM:
>>>> Hello everybody!
>>>>
>>>> This is probably going
I did previous samba setup 5 or 6
years ago, and I distinclty remember I was running into the same
issue, at more or less the same speed.
On 7 February 2010 04:26, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Bostjan Skufca put forth on 2/6/2010 6:14 PM:
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> This is probably goin
Hello everybody!
This is probably going to be a classic question but I cannot find a
decent answer on net.
I have samba server set up and the following things work flawlessly:
- iperf shows 92% link utilization
- FTP/SCP/HTTP transfers work in 10MB/s range.
However, when I mount samba share with
Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
On Monday 04 of October 2004 15:46, Holger Krull wrote:
> Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com schrieb:
> > When using 1 client, it is 95% idle, when using 2 clients it is 85% idle.
> >
> > When using 2 clients t
XP is not problematic, linux is
Regards,
Bostjan
On Monday 04 of October 2004 13:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko schrieb:
> >On Monday 04 October 2004 12:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I haven't found anything useful googling around so I decided to ask here.
> >>
gt; You may want to dig more facts:
>
> * is server CPU 100% loaded or not? Client CPU?
> * does bandwidth increase if you download several large files
> from same share in parallel?
>
> You may use attached program to collect various statistics.
> I compiled it wi
5MB/s.
Server and workstation machines are using 2.4.27 and samba 2.2.12 (slackware
distro).
Is anyone familiar with this issue?
Best regards,
Bostjan Skufca
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
12 matches
Mail list logo
