On 2013-10-11 9:49 AM, samba-requ...@lists.samba.org
samba-requ...@lists.samba.org wrote:
REMOVED COMPONENTS
==
The Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) has been removed.
Details why SWAT has been removed can be found on the samba-technical mailing
list:
week and give
you the information about it.
--
Best regards,
*/Charles Marcus/*
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
*678.514.6224 | 678.514.6299 fax*
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Am 06.10.2013 23:27, schrieb Charles Marcus:
Fyi... this is a known problem (with both renames and newly created
files/folders, and even deleted foles/folders) on Windows 7, even with a
real Windows Server... never seen it on XP, but it happens all the time
on Windows 7
On 2012-04-20 2:17 AM, Alexander Busam wrote:
Alexander Busam schrieb:
A new created file type association (e. g. .sql -- notepad++) get
lost when I relogon to windows.
I use Windows 7 32-bit with roaming profiles. Installed version of
Samba is 3.5.9.
Any ideas and help welcome :-)
... is
On 2012-03-30 3:18 AM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
El 29/03/12 22:36, Miguel Medalha escribió:
Charles wrote:
The stuff in t he roaming profiles (very little) is copied back/forth
at login/out, the stuff in t he redirected folders is *synchronized*
at all times using the Offline Files
On 2012-03-30 12:35 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
I was simply pointing out that the *default* behavior was to always
cache all data in redirected folders on the local client using the tried
and true 'offline files' technology, but in a different way with respect
Miguel - please stop sending to me directly, I am on the list.
On 2012-03-29 4:36 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
NO, IT DOESN'T!
Microsoft disagrees - see below.
You are introducing a new theme altogether: Offline Files.
No, I am not. Redirected Folders *uses* the
On 2012-03-29 2:00 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
El 27/03/12 17:32, Miguel Medalha escribió:
If you want the files only on the server, you should look into
Folder redirection. The Samba docs contain good info on that.
You can use roaming profiles only, folder redirection only, or a
On 2012-03-29 3:36 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
Folder Redirection will always (I think - or maybe Samba has a way to
disable this, but I don't think it would be a good idea at all) store
local cached copy of those folders on the local computer... what it
accomplishes is it
On 2012-02-04 10:33 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 02:54:13PM, Mike Howard wrote:
I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find anything
recent. Using Samba4 and windows clients, the client logs include
lots off 'windows has detected that offline caching is enabled on
On 2011-06-11 2:00 PM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Thu, June 9, 2011 09:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe
AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters.
This should be official list policy for ALL
On 2011-06-10 2:00 PM, Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info wrote:
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
It's not clear to me... are ALL autoresponders braindead or are there
some that don't notice it's a mailing list contacting them?
Some auto-responders look at the to: field and if it's not directly sent
to
It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe
AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters.
This should be official list policy for ALL email lists...
On 2011-06-08 2:00 PM, samba-requ...@lists.samba.org wrote:
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba Digest, Vol
On 2011-06-09 2:00 PM, Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 09.06.2011 15:46, schrieb Charles Marcus:
It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe
AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters.
This should be official list policy for ALL
$
NET USE Z: \\SERWER\GEO$
NET USE W: \\SERWER\SKANY
regedit /s \\serwer\netlogon\placesbargeo.reg
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224
678.514.6299 fax
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
We're running a Debian Etch Server with Samba 3.0.24 as primary domain
controller for a XP dominated network. For various reasons, we're
migrating our server to a new machine running on Centos 5.4 (and Samba
3.0.33). Additionally, I decided to get rid of our messy LDAP setup,
as it is quite a
On 11/17/2009, Brian (bbayorg...@charter.net) wrote:
Good question, I'm not sure where it originates, but I recall seeing
the recommendation someplace (some faq, howto, etc) to set SO_RCVBUF
and SO_SNDBUF to just those values to IMPROVE performance.
Blindly following 'some [vague] faq, howto,
On 10/19/2009, Clayton Hill (ad...@ateamonsite.com) wrote:
idmap negative cache time (G)
This parameter specifies the number of seconds that Winbind's idmap
snip
120 what? hmmm seconds? minutes? LOL
and
winbind cache time (G)
This parameter specifies the number of
On 10/8/2009 2:23 AM, Philipp Boksberger wrote:
I have a Samba 3.2.5 Server running on Debian. I use tdbsam as a password
database and wonder how I can change the Workstations value in order to
control the allowed workstations for a particular user. Last year I had a
configuration with ldap
On 10/9/2009 8:45 AM, Philipp Boksberger wrote:
My understanding is you cannot manage this attribute from the pdbedit
CLI, you must use the NT4 Domain User Manager.
I tried the NT4 Domain User Manager, but there I can only enter up to eight
workstations while I need 30 to 50 entries there.
On 9/29/2009, m (mag...@gmail.com) wrote:
I am pulling my hair out trying to figure out why trying to rename my
computer joined to a Samba domain (version 3.2.3) keeps failing with
Access is Denied.
Never tried this on a Samba domain, but when joined to a windows domain,
you must make sure
On 9/7/2009, Anthony Accurso (ihtar...@gmail.com) wrote:
Samba on its own never listens on port 7.
Yeah, and I've never seen a pig fly before either.
No need to be an ass about it.
But that's the last time I take something like that for granted.
You still haven't proven that it is samba
On 9/5/2009 1:06 AM, Barry L. Bond wrote:
Gary,
SWAT is neato! This is a wonderful summarizing and helping tool! I
didn't know about it at all!
I thought SWAT was deprecated/unmaintained as of a LONG time ago?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On 9/5/2009 7:02 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I thought SWAT was deprecated/unmaintained as of a LONG time ago?
Nope, not true. We still ship and support it. It's not exactly
recommended but it still works and is maintained.
Hmm, ok, weird... it must have been a comment from someone more solidly
On 8/21/2009 3:35 AM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
Perhaps, if the author is not interested in updating it, I could just
add a MySQL option to the full_audit module if it's recording the same
data. Might be worth doing that just to get it into the main Samba
distribution, because I'm sure there are
On 8/18/2009, jw (jwde...@gmail.com) wrote:
directory mask = 0775
The reason you're not getting 775 perms on the new directory
is that the default directory mask is 0755, which masks out
the write permission for the group.
Just setting inherit owner, and directory mask = 0775
should be
On 8/6/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote:
Don't change the veto files semantics please.
It wouldn't be 'changing' the semantics, it would be adding to them.
I don't see any way adding this new 'semantic' could break any existing
installations.
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To
On 8/7/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote:
I know, but I've had a lot of experience on this, and
I really don't want to change that code unless there
is a known bug.
Well, thats the last word then, as I certainly won't question or second
guess you on something like that... :)
Adding
On 8/6/2009, Illtud Daniel (illtud.dan...@llgc.org.uk) wrote:
But now we've gone full circle, and you may as well just
extend the Veto Files syntax to allow:
Veto Files = foo.jpg, !*.jpg, *
This is what I meant.
Keep both options, just give them the ability to take the ! as an
exception
On 8/3/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote:
If you wanted to veto everything except jpeg files I imagine you
would not use the veto files directive at all and simply specify:
Allowed Files = /*.jpg/
If you wanted to allow only jpeg files but not foo.jpg you would use Allowed
Files
On 7/29/2009, Jeremy Allison (j...@samba.org) wrote:
Any preference for precedence of 'allowed files' vs 'veto files'?
Or would you want an apache-style 'Order allowed veto' option?
(please say no).
veto files should take precedence.
The way postfix does this when blocking ip ranges but
On 7/25/2009 12:10 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
As an FYI, I am using Samba-3.2.4, idmap_rid with tdbsam as backend for
about 3 years with 2000 users on member server configuration authenticating
AD 2003. Occasionally I had db corrupt issues, but restarting winbind
resolved most of the times.
On 7/24/2009, John H Terpstra - Samba Team (j...@samba.org) wrote:
As an FYI, I am using Samba-3.2.4, idmap_rid with tdbsam as backend for
about 3 years with 2000 users on member server configuration authenticating
AD 2003. Occasionally I had db corrupt issues, but restarting winbind
resolved
On 7/24/2009 7:50 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
I don't know about 20k, but I definitely don't see the need to allow
large attachments on a large mailing list like this...
The caveat is that things are not archived completely then. URLs get
invalid over time.
Doesn't matter. The main purpose of
On 7/22/2009 7:21 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
What size limit should we observe for messages to this list?
1) 64 KBytes
2) 128 KBytes
3) 256 KBytes
4) 512 KBytes
5) 1 MByte
6) 2 MBytes
7) Any size
None of the above. 20k should be more than enough. Those who wish to share
more should upload
On 7/10/2009, Regis Niggemann (reg...@techheads.com) wrote:
Of course the problem with this method is you are granting that group admin
rights to all those computers. If a single account in that group with those
rights becomes infected with some malware, it is possible for that malware
to
On 7/7/2009, Leonardo Carneiro (lscarne...@veltrac.com.br) wrote:
Guys, you won't believe, but after ANOTHER unexpected power cut,
1st rule for critical systems is, make sure you don't have 'unexpected
power cuts'...
Do you not have a decent UPS on this system? Is it not set to safely
shut down
On 7/7/2009, Matt Burkhardt (m...@imparisystems.com) wrote:
However, it creates home directories on the small OS drive and he would
like to have them all moved to the large RAID array.
Can't you just set the default Home directory for new Users to wherever
you want it (ie, the large RAID
On 7/6/2009 9:43 AM, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
Now, if I remove the Novell client completely, things work _perfectly_.
I can browse and connect, disconnect, reconnect, the works, all at
normal speed.
A shot in the dark, but there was a bug reported on the NOD32 forums
dealing specificalyy
On 7/2/2009, Matthew Daubenspeck (m...@oddprocess.org) wrote:
When I have the current Novell Netware client installed on XP machines,
any initial browsing or opening of connected Samba drives is painfully
slow. Slow as in 20-30 seconds. The hourglass appears and things just
seem to lock for
On 7/1/2009, christoph.be...@desy.de (christoph.be...@desy.de) wrote:
my windows folks migrated to AD 2008 R2
Interesting... seeing as its not even released yet...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On 6/6/2009, Edward Ned Harvey (sa...@nedharvey.com) wrote:
I don't mess with the smb.conf file. I admin the whole thing via SWAT, as
follows:
Hasn't SWAT been deprecated and unsupported for a very long time?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
On 4/1/2009 10:18 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Is this ever going to happen? Or am I waiting in vain?
Can you please file a bug report on this and assign to me?
I have a git branch for vampire a w2k+ domain into passdb (almost
finished). Having a bugid would be good reminder to finally finish
On 5/8/2009, amit.anjarle...@tcs.com (amit.anjarle...@tcs.com) wrote:
Pls guide as i m new to linux.
Sorry, I feel your pain, but this is not a 'new-to-linux' group, this is
for discussing problems with samba.
You need to learn how to for help in the appropriate place - in this
case, a place
On 5/8/2009, amit.anjarle...@tcs.com (amit.anjarle...@tcs.com) wrote:
I think u have taken wrong meaning of word 'new-to-linux'. I have cleared
RHCE having good knowledge of all the applications used in linux
including samba.
Well... again, not to be rude, but when you say you are new to
On 5/6/2009 4:57 AM, Richard Foltyn wrote:
Is this normal?
It's a self-signed certificate as the samba project likely does not want
to pay several hundred USD per year for an official certificate.
So yes, this is normal.
Yeah... this was a really dumb decision by the firefox developers to
On 5/6/2009, Elias Knuutila (el...@elekno.fi) wrote:
I have problem with client password chat with Samba (3.0.24) PDC on
Suse after updating OS to service pack 1.
Problems like this are usually better answered on the SuSE (or whatever
distro) list, as it is more often than not a
On 5/6/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
I haven't checked, but hopefully they mellowed this warning out a LOT
and provided a single-click way to add the cert...
I clicked send too soon... of course, that should have ended with 'in
the upcoming 3.5 version
On 3/24/2009 8:22 PM, Guenther Deschner wrote:
Is this ever going to happen? Or am I waiting in vain?
Can you please file a bug report on this and assign to me?
I have a git branch for vampire a w2k+ domain into passdb (almost
finished). Having a bugid would be good reminder to finally
On 3/30/2009, Hubert Choma (hubert...@wp.pl) wrote:
I chenged hardware time clock -w (write system clock to hardware clock
synchro).
But users cant' login at 8:00 morning I must back logon hours one
hour back in usrmgr from 8:00 to 7:00 and then users can login without
the problem.
On 3/24/2009, Guenther Deschner (g...@samba.org) wrote:
Is this ever going to happen? Or am I waiting in vain?
Can you please file a bug report on this and assign to me?
Hmmm... I tried, but get the following error when I try to submit it:
Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save
Is this ever going to happen? Or am I waiting in vain?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On 2/19/2009, Emmanuel (e...@free.fr) wrote:
Nevertheless apart from solution 1. , is it possible to only show the share
directory for the authaurized account?
Something like browseable = no except owner
Would the hide unreadable parameter work for you?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To
On 2/16/2009 7:31 AM, Dragan Lukic wrote:
Can anyone help me?
I cannot imagine why is my question so hard
Looks like I will have to make at least one post to this thread each day
until
I finally get a reply/solution.
Doing that will likely get you totally ignored by most everyone
On 2/13/2009, John Drescher (dresche...@gmail.com) wrote:
Go figure.. Also, nothing really changed on the system apart from upgrading
the samba package from 2 to 3.2.8, that's the strange thing..
Considering that is a HUGE jump in versions, should you really be
surprised that there are some
On 2/4/2009, David Markey (dmar...@dodds.dmarkey.com) wrote:
I have a PDC with an LDAP backend that i want to use SWAT to give
users the option to change their password via the web interface.
Hasn't SWAT has been deprecated/unmaintained for a long time?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To
On 2/3/2009, BOURIAUD (david.bouri...@ac-rouen.fr) wrote:
The fact is that we can't use imap here. Well, we could if whe would
like, but who on earth would like to work with a 25Mb imap box ? No
one.
? Many of our users have 1+GB imap maildirs... works great...
We don't have much space on
On 1/15/2009, Michael Heydon (micha...@jaswin.com.au) wrote:
you could use psexec to run net time as an administrator
I always add the 'Domain Users' Group to the local 'Power Users' group
on each workstation when I add one, then control who can log onto what
from the server.
Power Users do
On 1/16/2009, L.P.H. van Belle (ob...@bazuin.nl) wrote:
Or better add the domain users group to the policy that allows users
to change the time.
The problem is, lots of programs just won't work right without a user
having power user perms...
For me, its easier to give them the perms, then just
On 12/29/2008, James Chavez (james.cha...@sanmina-sci.com) wrote:
I am using Samba with ADS authentication. I am able to map drives and
open and close files with no issues with the exception of Microsoft
Outlook email files. So from within Outlook, I open one of these email
files and I get an
On 12/18/2008, wes (sa...@the-wes.com) wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I have entered username map=/etc/samba/users.map into
smb.conf, and this is the contents of users.map:
wesley=wes
but, I am unable to log in with wes - it gives me the authentication
failed message. I have checked the logs,
On 11/16/2008, Dariem Pérez Herrera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It doesn't solve my problem, that option is for hiding files within a
shared folder if they are not readable, but what I want is to hide
the inaccessible folder.
It also hides unreadable folders...
So, if you add this to the
On 11/16/2008, Dariem Pérez Herrera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I just want the people from my department to see their homes (they
are the only users who can access that machine by connecting to
Samba, because I've specified valid users in [homes], but keeping
visible homes for the rest of the
On 11/13/2008 5:36 AM, lmhelp wrote:
Hi Alex, hi Charles, hi others,
Thank you for your answers.
It would be much easier to continue this discussion if you would follow
the standard/accepted quoting methods...
For example, the key State in every profile: it can have various
values meaning
On 11/12/2008, lmhelp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As soon as you unjoin/rejoin a new domain, XP will
create a username.NEWDOMAIN profile on your laptop.
Apparently it is what Vista is doing...
A c:\Users\lmhelp.a_samba_domain_name is being created.
Which is precisely the way it is designed
On 11/12/2008, lmhelp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I can tell you it is possible with XP.
No, it isn't... what you describe below is NOT logging onto two
different DOMAINS, it is using a domain profile, but NOT a ROAMING profile.
I can log on my computer:
as my_computer_hostname\lmhelp
as
On 11/11/2008 4:16 AM, Urs Golla wrote:
Ok. it seems i am not the only one with this problem:
http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg88996.html
I did a net ads lookup and net ads info before and after the Problem
occurred. The output (DC etc..) was exactly the same. I dont know
On 11/9/2008 2:59 AM, Mohammad Reza Hosseini wrote:
Hello again,
Solved! using thishttp://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-May/085278.html
??
That thread does NOT provide a solution...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On 10/20/2008, Matthew Delves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My questions are:
1) What is required for the smb.conf to get it talking to the windows
2k server?
2) What other environment configuration is required to get vampire to
work correctly?
My understanding is that vampire will NOT
On 10/16/2008 11:25 AM, Jonathan Bougher wrote:
I Do think the local hard disk speed is cause *some* limitation, but since I
can upload download the same and other files and directories to the server
at 4x the speed, I do not think that is the main limitation.
I am still perplexed by this
On 10/14/2008, Jonathan Bougher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to load)
Using roaming profiles for profiles so large is - well - insane.
You won't get much better performance...
I'd look for another way (than using huge roaming
On 10/9/2008, Tim Bates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If you set it at a domain level like you said, it would give them
admin rights anywhere they can log into.
But if you control which workstations they can log into, this isn't
really a problem - save the part of them having local admin rights...
On 10/9/2008, Greg WOLD ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm having difficulty installing samba v3.2.4 on my CentOS 5 box. I've
downloaded the samba-3.2.4.tar.gz file to /usr/tmp (svn gave a timeout
so I decided to download the gz file instead). I ran tar xvzf
samba-3.2.4 to unpack it. Then I
All of the links on this page appear to be broken. Of course, I didn't
click on every one, but after discovering thet the link to 'hide
unreadable' was broken, I clicked on a few more, and they all resulted
in Not Found errors...
On 10/6/2008, Jesse Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My Home directory comes up as a share in Network Neighborhood but it also
has browsable=no which is confusing:
You might like the 'hide unreadable' option - it can really make
navigating shares with lots of subfolders much easier, if you only
On 9/30/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our PDC accidentally crashed and to eliminate down time,
I hate it when that happens... I much prefer a server that crashes
intentionally.
...
sorry, couldn't resist... ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On 9/9/2008, Veselin Kantsev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On the 3.2.3 samba server:
From XP I can browse the folder containing that file, but if I try to copy
the file itself I get Cannot read from source disk windows error.
I can however copy the folder that contains the file.
Windows doesn't
On 9/3/2008 9:04 AM, Brad C wrote:
Hi Guys,
Advise, I have 200 users, they all have access to 20 shares in different
combinations. They all have their own netlogon scripts... its a management
nightmare,
is there a way to create a universal netlogon script that I can include all
the shares
On 8/29/2008 1:54 PM, Gregory Carter wrote:
Oh, and BY THE WAY.
I do not want to be a total cynic, but you are expecting samba to
replace a software product that the SuSE corporation directly receives
MILLIONS in contributions from, said vendor of product it is replacing.
(Microsoft.)
On 8/26/2008, Jakov Sosic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
OK, I've set it to 0, and still have issues with transfer rates being around
7.5-8.5 MB/s on a 100Mbit network.
Max theortetical speed over a 100Mb network is 12.5MB, so 7.5-8.5 isn';t
all that bad...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To
On 8/26/2008, Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
smb: \backup\studio12\ get SunStudio12ml-solaris-sparc-200709-pkg.tar.bz2
getting file
\backup\studio12\SunStudio12ml-solaris-sparc-200709-pkg.tar.bz2 of size
1194253206 as SunStudio12ml-solaris-sparc-200709-pkg.tar.bz2 (11145.3
kb/s)
On 8/22/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
yes, turn off Pofile acls,
This is the second time you have said this, but never answered my
request for WHY would you suggest this, when the samba devs say it is
REQUIRED?
Please, either provide an answer/rationale for why you are
On 8/20/2008, Albrecht Dreß ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Maybe I should add that I didn't create the accounts using Samba, but
through a hack to the Kolab groupware server which also uses LDAP as
backend. The hack assigns User and Group SID as
Oh, yeah, well...
Then I suggest you go talk to
On 8/19/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Remove the profile acls =yes
???
Isn't this REQUIRED for the profiles share?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On 8/15/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've seen lots of printer problems in the 3.2.x branch and we print about
1.5 Mil. Pages a month, so printing must work ok for me.
These are supposedly all fixed in the upcoming 3.2.2, so you might want
to wait for that.
Any recent
On 8/13/2008, Alberto Moreno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The main problem I have is that, some folders: Application Data and
Local Settings, wont let me redirect them to each user profile share.
Application Data should work fine, but why on earth would you want to do
Local Settings?
--
Best
On 8/5/2008 12:19 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
I know Debian tends to backport patches, but it would seem like this
would be a bit of a pain to start from this point.
Only security patches.
Is that right? Does that mean that if something is completely broken, it
will stay that way for the life
On 8/4/2008 9:58 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
The general use for winbind is to be able to use an MS domain controller
for authentication eliminating the need to separately create
matching 'nix users.
The special case for using winbind is when, using Samba as the PDC, you
wish to insist that a
On 7/28/2008, Christopher Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
on 25% of the machines, it creates them as:
c:\docments and settings\username.DOMAINNAME
It only does this if there is already a LOCAL user account in use with
that same username. This is well documented behavior.
--
Best regards,
On 7/24/2008, Christopher Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For example, a user like c:\documents and settings\rguyton changes to
c:\documents and settings\rguyton.HMDCDOMAIN
Is there a way to get this to use the existing profile?
I think there is a Microsoft tool for doing this, but I've
On 7/24/2008, Andrew Masterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Grab C:\Documents and Settings\USERNAME, copy it into C:\Documents
and Settings\Default User before logging onto the domain. (or blow away
the USERNAME.DOMAIN profile and re-login)
This has NEVER worked for me.
--
Best regards,
On 7/24/2008 3:05 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/24/2008, Andrew Masterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Grab C:\Documents and Settings\USERNAME, copy it into C:\Documents
and Settings\Default User before logging onto the domain. (or blow away
the USERNAME.DOMAIN profile and re-login)
This has
On 7/22/2008, Justin Pittman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-200GiB is taking a few days to backup
Something is obviously very wrong - that is just insane...
Do regular copies (drag-n-drop) take the same amount of time?
What is Samba config for the share(s) being backed up (contents of
On 7/23/2008, Thomas Vito ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I promise i have changed anything ;)
Obviously *something* changed between when you first *started* Samba and
when you rebooted...
That is where I would be looking...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On 7/2/2008, Felix Miata ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4090 was filed, and marked
fixed, without actually being fixed.
Did you re-open it and provide evidence it wasn't fixed?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On 6/27/2008, Gilles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there a way to tell XP to remember the password between
reboots/sessions?
Why on gods green earth would you want to do that?
I know you can configure XP to auto-login with a certain
username/password, but I've never even considered
On 6/17/2008, Leandro Tracchia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
i'm not sure how to create different logon scripts for different
users. right now i have one logon script called 'logon.bat' that maps
all users to a server share and syncs the time with the server. i need
to be able to map different
On 6/10/2008, Leandro Tracchia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
at this point i expected to see the wallpaper and
files i had assigned and created on the first client machine. the files were
present, BUT the wallpaper was not kept.
What wallpaper?
I have ALWAYS had to right-clickproperties on the
On 5/30/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
and this is why you also must check you Temp and internet Temp
sigh
Unless someone intentionally moved them, these ARE IN THE LOCAL SETTINGS
FOLDER so NO, you do NOT need to worry about these.
This is very simple to check - do you
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
