Re: [Samba] Samba4 Integration With Google

2013-01-19 Thread Ciro Iriarte
Fernando Rd | Glendale, California | 91201- 2214 > (818)-730-5846 Mobile | (818)-244-6571 Main* > * > > Well, having and LDAP directory as your Samba backend could help. GApps has an LDAP sync tool, the only downside is that it needs the password to be hashed with SHA1 or MD5 without sa

Re: [Samba] samba on SLES 10: binding problem

2010-11-27 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2010/11/28 Ciro Iriarte : > 2010/11/24 Stefan G. Weichinger : >> Am 10.11.2010 10:37, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> >>> I'd be thankful for any thoughts or advice ... thanks! >> >> As I haven't received any feedback, just one another question: >

Re: [Samba] samba on SLES 10: binding problem

2010-11-27 Thread Ciro Iriarte
rg/repositories/Printing/SLE_11_SP1/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/samba:/MAINTAINED:/SLE_11/SLE_11_SP1/ By the way, that would turn your installation in an "unsupported" setup... Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com -- -- To unsubscribe from th

Re: [Samba] LVS and SAMBA

2010-11-22 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2010/11/22 Jim McDonough : > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Ciro Iriarte wrote: >> From what I heard about the SLES+HA solution, a CTDB cluster can't act >> as Domain controller... Am I wrong?. > I have not come up with any reason why it couldn't, nor have I heard

Re: [Samba] LVS and SAMBA

2010-11-21 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2010/11/19 Jim McDonough : > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Michael Adam wrote: >> Ciro Iriarte wrote: >>> 2010/11/3 Volker Lendecke : >>> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 11:03:20AM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote: >>> >> Hi, would it be possible

Re: [Samba] LVS and SAMBA

2010-11-03 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2010/11/3 Volker Lendecke : > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 11:03:20AM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote: >> Hi, would it be possible to  run two nodes with SAMBA+LDAP and a OCFS2 >> filesystem, with LVS load balancing WITHOUT CTDB?. This would be >> relying only on OCFS2 file locking. T

[Samba] LVS and SAMBA

2010-11-03 Thread Ciro Iriarte
Hi, would it be possible to run two nodes with SAMBA+LDAP and a OCFS2 filesystem, with LVS load balancing WITHOUT CTDB?. This would be relying only on OCFS2 file locking. The idea is to provide authentication, HA file service and load balancing. Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http

Re: [Samba] CTDB and PDC Role

2010-11-02 Thread Ciro Iriarte
while the PDC is down, what about fileserving?, using another IP for that service and moving it with the FS from one node to another would work (am I right?). If the missing WINS service breaks the network, would a single samba instance moved as a resource between nodes be better that a PDC/BDC pair? R

Re: [Samba] CTDB and PDC Role

2010-11-02 Thread Ciro Iriarte
eserver cluster as all the nodes use the same NETBIOS name. Should I go with a Active/Standby figure outside Samba, that is, a DRBD FS mounts in one node at a time; and a regular BDC/PDC pair? Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] CTDB and PDC Role

2010-11-01 Thread Ciro Iriarte
://sambaxp.org/files/SambaXP2010-DATA/Rolf_Schmidt.pdf Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Re: Re: Re: mod_ntlm_winbind

2006-06-14 Thread Ciro Iriarte
"Ciro Iriarte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Aaron Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 01:04 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote: >>> > Okay. Tr

[Samba] Re: Re: Re: mod_ntlm_winbind

2006-06-12 Thread Ciro Iriarte
"Aaron Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 01:04 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote: >> > Okay. Try running the ntlm_auth line in your configuration above, >> > directly on the command line. What do

[Samba] Re: Re: mod_ntlm_winbind

2006-06-11 Thread Ciro Iriarte
> Okay. Try running the ntlm_auth line in your configuration above, > directly on the command line. What do you see? > > /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp -d 400 > > Cheers, > Aaron > host:~ # su - wwwrun -s /bin/bash [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=sq

[Samba] Re: mod_ntlm_winbind

2006-06-11 Thread Ciro Iriarte
>> >> Configuration >> >> >> --.htaccess-- >> AuthName "NTLM Authentication thingy" >> NTLMBasicAuth on >> NTLMAuthHelper "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp -d >> 400" >> NTLMBasicAuthoritative on >> AuthType NTLM >> require valid-user > > I added a Directo

[Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind

2006-06-10 Thread Ciro Iriarte
[client 10.129.7.146] (2)No such file or directory: couldn't spawn child ntlm helper process: ntlm_auth, referer: http://10.129.4.50/nagios/side.html I hope you understand my messed explanation, and help me if you have any idea about my possible mistakes, i tried many configuration variat