n Thu, 2005-10-06 at 00:53 +1000, Josh Kelley wrote:
> Duncan Robertson wrote:
>
> >Also some usage patterns may affect things.. jfs seems to work much
> >better than ext3 for reading directories with LOTS of files in it, a
> >situation which not uncommon on large samba sh
We are also looking into this, as we are examining moving some samba
shares from Solaris to Linux
Also some usage patterns may affect things.. jfs seems to work much
better than ext3 for reading directories with LOTS of files in it, a
situation which not uncommon on large samba shares.
jfs file s
