On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 22:52, Fernando Torrez
wrote:
> It was working great for the first 6 months as a logon and file server for
> around 40 >windows >computers. But lately from time to time the samba server
> loses to be the master
1. Disable "computer browser" service on the win7 PCs
2. Se
Local machine is CentOS 5.4, with samba 3.5.2 rpms from sernet.
Remote machine is samba 3.0.something set up with share level security.
On local machine:
$ smbclient '\\srv\shr' -U%
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.30-1abc]
Server not using user level security and no password supplie
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Timo Meinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Helmut,
>
>
> It's really curious, because if I restart "my" samba server, it
> _always_ wins the election. The problem arises, if the samba server is
> some hours online.
Same issue.
I put the following in cron:
#!
On 7/16/07, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Dragan Krnic wrote:
> A copy from a samba share to the same share frequently fails
> with error "The specified network name is no longer available".
>
> The remaining copy is the same size as source bu
3.0.25rc1 has the same issue.
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:52:05 +0200, Giulio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Vista32
>3.0.25pre2 (I understand vista patches for "share level" are already in)
>security = share (with "valid users" on share definition)
>host msd
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:46:09 -0700, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:52:05PM +0200, Giulio wrote:
>> Vista32
>> 3.0.25pre2 (I understand vista patches for "share level" are already in)
>> security = share (with "
Vista32
3.0.25pre2 (I understand vista patches for "share level" are already in)
security = share (with "valid users" on share definition)
host msdfs = no
user/pass in smbpasswd file.
If I use "connect network drive..." method with "connect as another user",
then it will always work.
If I u
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
Basically spnego fails with vista and you have somehow force to downgrade to
ntlmssp.
To samba devels:
I see the bug submitter sent 2 emails to samba-technical that went
unanswered. I don't understand why, the issue is real and blocking.
Maybe you
3.0.21c on RHEL3.
I use smbclient to transfer files from Samba to WIN PCs, name resolution is
through bcast on local LAN.
The network is not managed by me, all PC's are connected through switches
(no routers).
Sometimes ago network admins started decreasing the MAC addr table timeout
in the swit
Linux Red Hat 6.x:
egcs-1.1.2-24
glibc-2.1.3-22
binutils-2.9.1.0.23-6
kernel-2.2.22-6.2.3
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv-devel-1.9.1-1
Last working is 3.0.10, never tried 3.0.11 3.0.12.
3.0.13 and 3.0.14a will crash at first smbd usage.
Notes:
- To make
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:27:20 -0400, "William Beilstein"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not true, I didn't say to assume or negotiate anything;
> I suggested that the option be there. Always do a binary transfer,
> except if the user explicitly says "ASCII" which would mean
>that he wants to transfer
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:26:11 +, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:55:08PM +0100, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
>> Hi ,
>> I've just tried Samba 3.0.1pre2 on redhat 9 with xpclient.
>> I can connect ( very slow ) but I have :
>> [2003/11/10 14:37:51, 0] lib/uti
host-A: 3.0.1pre1, Red Hat 7.3. (domain logons & domain master = yes)
host-B: 3.0.1pre1, Red Hat 6.x
host-C: 2.2.x, red Hat 6.x
=== On host-A
smbclient cannot show correct version for same server's samba:
smbclient -L host-A -d1 -Uunknown% | grep Domain
[2003/10/24 16:36:38, 1] client/client.
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:32:16 +0200, "Sebastian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Following configuration i used before samba 3:
> character set = ISO8859-1
> codepage = CP850
>
>I could read an write files with umlauts from my Win2k Client. Doing an
>ls at the linux console showed a ? (que
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:08:45 +0200, Kolly Christian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am testing Samba 3.0.0 on a Tru64Unix v 5.1b. I compile it with gcc et
>gnumake.
>I am able to start it and I can see a share.
>Until now, I have only one problem: Logs are full of messages like
>
>"Error loading mo
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:20:57 -0800 (PST), Jonathan Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The command "ver" returns the version, but that's not really helpful,
>because in a batch file script, you can't use the output to control the
>direction of the script.
ver | find "95" > nul
if not errorlevel 1
On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:41:46 -0500, George Lenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I was trying to mount a Windows share as a regular user on my system and
>smbmount said that smbmnt should be installed 'suid root'. I know how
alternative to suid:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-December
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:07:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Redhat 7.2 contains samba 2.2.1 rpm (i.e no winbind)
>Downloaded samba-2.2.7-1.i386.rpm from samba.org mirror
>rpm ivh samba-2.2.7-1.i386.rpm then I get a failed dependency error.
Which dependency?
>Redhat support was, in this case,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:29:00 -0500, Robert Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a few ideas about how to make my Linux server mount up a shared
>folder on a Windows machine at boot time, however I would like to know if
>there are other methods of getting it to work.
Have you consi
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:15:25 + (GMT), John H Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>When you find a way the Rsync team would love to hear from you. So the
>answer is No.
I asked because original poster seems to need this option. See last 3 lines
of last paragraph of his email.
I thought since A
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:43:42 + (GMT), John H Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:11:38PM -, alex wrote:
>> >
>> > All we really require is the ability to replicate a tree structure from
>> > one SMB server to ano
On 16 Nov 2002 16:01:23 -, "bimal pandit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>lib/access.c:check_access(320)
> denied connection from 10.10.10.10( ip of xp machine)
>the ip of my linux m/c is 10.10.10.12
>can anyone help me??
Doesn't the above suggest you anything?
Maybe a look at your smb.conf
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:45:32 +0100, Noel Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Eventually I tried running just /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd - and still got
>two nmbd processes. Is this correct behaviour?
If your samba is wins server this is normal behavior (not new in 2.2.6).
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:09:21 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Thank you for clearing that up. Since we are running
>kernel 2.4.18, and this patch appears to apply to
>2.4.4, is it safe to assume that this patch need not
>be applied?
No. I briefly looked at an 2.4.18something
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:47:10 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Thank you for the URL. That will be a good reference
>in the future, but for now, I feel that some questions
>remain unanswered.
>
> 1. Does smbmount use a keep alive time setting?
> 2. Does smbmount use the smb.co
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:43:30 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>There seems to be an issue with smbfs mounts at times
>where connectivity may be lost (e.g. Win share becomes
>unavailable) causing local processes such as lsof or
>ps, among others, to hang.
http://www.hojdpunkte
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:09:19 -0400, Adam Glasgall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've set up Samba and CUPS on our testing server here, and used
>smbcupsadd to upload the Adobe PS drivers to the server as directed in
>Win9x is another story altogether. It's clearly trying to get the
>drivers from t
On Sat, 08 Jun 2002 08:58:21 +0200, Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, see
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=oplock_break+xp+group:*samba*&hl=it&lr=&scoring=d&selm=a774fn%2413cp%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=2
>for the same p
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 16:48:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy Allison) wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:02:05PM +0200, Sylvain BARTHELEMY wrote:
>> I search for a solution about the "oplock break" problem that occurs
>> sometimes on my RH7.0 / Samba 2.2.4 machine when accessing Excel files on a
On Thu, 16 May 2002 10:47:42 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy Allison) wrote:
>> veto files = /.*/
>> whenever you connect to it the client process hangs, the smbd starts
>> consuming cpu time and cannot be killed but with "kill -9".
>Can you attach to the process compiled with -g (debug symbols
On Thu, 16 May 2002 14:13:32, Thierry ITTY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>no experience about it but this could be some funny kind of dead loop,
>samba trying to consider . or .. (directories) as vetoed files
>
>i'd try some more restrictive pattern, like .??* which means "veto files
>beginning with
linux 2.2.19/rh6x
I use in a share
veto files = /.*/
whenever you connect to it the client process hangs, the smbd starts
consuming cpu time and cannot be killed but with "kill -9".
This is the last part of the smbd log
[2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(319)
3 user groups:
wed in the message (hunk failed).
Apply it by hand, so did I.
--
Giulio Orsero
GoldenSer s.r.l.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wed, 15 May 2002 14:46:34 +0200, Denis Sbragion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm trying to use the VFS modules included with version 2.2.4. System is
>RedHat 7.2 with precompiled binaries from samba.org. Modules (audit &
>recycle) have been recompiled from sources. The recycle modules doesn't
samba-2.2.4 on linux 2.2.x (Red Hat 6.x). No large file enabled.
recicle.c as shipped in 2.2.4 cause sig11.
If I apply this patch that I found on usenet then it's ok
==
--- ./examples/VFS/recycle.c.orig Mon Mar 25 12:56:47 2002
+++ ./examples/VFS/recycle.cFri Apr 12 18:21:54 2002
@@ -
35 matches
Mail list logo
