this would have been covered/solved somewhere but it seems to
be beyond my searching skills. I saw many posts talking about how
samba sharing a nfs read only mount should work fine, but no details
of the configuration or issues similar to mine.
Thank you for your time and advice,
--
Jacob Anawalt
--
>Find fs/smbfs/proc.c in your kernel source tree.
>Search for smb_proc_close_inode().
>See if changing any of the operations it does there helps.
> - remove the code after the "Kludge alert"
I did this, and still tar thinks the file was modified. Now I'm seeing the
ctime drift like Timo noticed
Well -f (force) has been mentioned, but since you specificaly said you'd
like to answer yes, use yes.
yes | cp -a (or whatever flags you want for cp)
It's a funny little program (but usefull, I'm not knocking it). Run it by
itself just for fun. Remember ctrl-c to break...
Jacob
"Brent Torrenga
Alex,
It sounds like you are trying to do w/ the mysql database what some
organizations have done with NIS/YP or are doing with LDAP or MS Directory
Services. If you are using a system that includes PAM, you can reconfigure
your system to look to sources other than the password file for username
l
smbtar and incremental backups
smbclient returns incorrect file size for large files
File changed as we read it
Re: SMBFS files receiving incorrect timestamps
If you are following the mailing list, but just joined you can find these at
news.gmane.org.
Jacob Anawalt
"Sykora, Dale" <
ay to avoid any misunderstanding of whether an archive is going
to contain those files or not.
Jacob Anawalt
> I don't know enough about the differance between the solutions to suggest
> one over the other. I just know that either solution seems to work, and
the
> first one makes i
on to work using smbtar to fix their own
scripts.
Jacob Anawalt
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
e is now bla,
bla, bla' string.
I'm posting the smbtar script fix info in a new message so it is easier to
find. I've checked the CVSweb and the file has the bug and hasn't been
modified for almost three years.
Jacob Anawalt
"Jacob Anawalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e more details in my post from 5 Dec 2002: Re: SMBFS files
receiving incorrect timestamps
Jacob
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:11:37AM -0700, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
> > (I have sent this to [EMAI
he file
has changed and that ls -l uses) that returns the wrong mtime? More likely
by some wierd twist tar always gets smbfs to report the right time at first
but then as the file is accessed (read by tar, ls) smbfs is then reporting
the wrong mtime?
Any suggested work-arounds in configuration set
s then reporting
the wrong mtime?
Any suggested work-arounds in configuration settings are appreciated. Maybe
when someone is going over the timestamp code, they might use this
information to fix the glitch (if it is in the smbfs/smb mount)
Jacob Anawalt
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Urban Widmark wrote:
s
11 matches
Mail list logo
