e: Domain Group
Comment :
Unless I'm missing something stupid, I thought this looked correct.
-James
>>> "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/24/06 10:57 AM >>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Money wrote:
> I still have
I still have the problem with domain groups in 3.0.23a with the patch listed on
the website applied. The 'net rpc info' command shows(still):
Domain Name: MATH_CS
Domain SID: S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041
Sequence number: 1153750888
Num users: 5
Num domain groups: 0
Num local groups:
Also, I just checked that if I downgrade to 3.0.22, that the groups start
working correctly. Maybe there is something that I need to do to get the groups
to work when I go to version 3.0.23?
-James
>>> "James Money" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/22/06 8:37 PM >>>
529
Num users: 5
Num domain groups: 0
Num local groups: 0
which is wrong for the number of local and domain groups. Also, 'net rpc group'
returns no groups as well.
-James
>>> "Jamrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/21/06 2:52 PM >>>
"James Money"
Yes, I see all the ldap groups from the machine. Matter of fact, I have
several machines already using ldap for authentication on the unix side.
-James
>>> "Jamrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/21/06 9:57 AM >>>
"James Money" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
I currently have samba version 3.0.23 installed using ldap as the
backend. I am experiencing the same problems as Holger Wesser mentioned
in his posting "USRMGR.exe not working properly". However, it appears
that the fix of creating the group mappings does not work. They appear
to be mapped correct
I currently have samba version 3.0.23 installed using ldap as the
backend. I am experiencing the same problems as Holger Wesser mentioned
in his posting "USRMGR.exe not working properly". However, it appears
that the fix of creating the group mappings does not work. They appear
to be mapped correct
