Thanks Jeremy
We are still using samba-2.2.8a and very happy with so far.
I asked this before in general list but didn't get response, may be you guys when get
a chance response
With samba-3.0, how would I join domain, if I don't have windows domain rights.
Till now, I used ./smbpasswd -j -r
Hi
I noticed mulitiple samba procceses when i run smbstatus. ( samba 2.2.8a on solaris ,
clients win2k )
pids are different sometimes for the same uid ( with root pid being same), machine
name is same again ( the client )
my understanding is, there should be one root process for smbd and
Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] RE: Samba processes
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
Abdul,
We saw your first posting. Please be patient.
Both smbd
-Original Message-
From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba processes
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
Just curios under what circumstances the smbd runs as user id process ( unix
id ) and running as root is a security risk?
Thanks in advance
-Abdul
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fol
resending, if any one knows the appreciate a brief answer.
thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@;motorola.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error code 0
Hi I have samba authentication issue
Hi I have samba authentication issue.
Erorring is as follows:
rejecting user, auth failed
domain_client_validtea: unable to validate apssword for user --- in doman
--- to domian controllaer ---. Error was code 0.
Just wondering what could be code0.
Is there a doc for smb error codes where i ca
thats for xp as client in samba domain ( samba as pdc )
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:brad@;langhorst.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Gene Huft
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] XP Reg Hacks
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 13:48, Gene Huft wrote:
>
Hi am also running samba 2.2.5 on sol2.6 servers, but not facing this memory
issue
can you elaborate on fcntl scaling issue
thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jra@;dp.samba.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Richard Davies
Cc: Walter Mautner; [EMAIL PRO
I thought someone suggested configuring smbd on a different port
but am not sure , never did this but curious as i think only one root smbd
runs and all are children
-Original Message-
From: Steve Morley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
did u find the solution
am guessing it might network or check the logs what it says...
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ipsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Mapped drives gets disconnected ?
Hi!
I'm running a Red
why dont you use samba in domain mode, and users map
it will be less maintenance right?
-Original Message-
From: Mac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] 2.2.5 and NIS question
>From: Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTEC
what error are you getting
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry N. Salmin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/6/02 1:40 AM
Subject: [Samba] Windows 2000 sp2 -> sp3
Hello All.
I was using Windows 2000 sp2 and Samba 2.2.3a. Windows 2000 users were
also registered on my Samba server with the same p
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:47 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other
daemons as needed, I THINK.
Joel
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:41:39PM
I am just curious of running 2 smbds, as i think one parent smbd process
runs on 139 and all others are children
-Original Message-
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Jason Joines; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versu
just a quick question, how do you run two smbd deamons on different ports
-Original Message-
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Jason Joines; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
Just making all this stuff
so are you using xcopy or copy dos command in your script?
-Original Message-
From: Vinay Kudithipudi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:21 PM
To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
Javid,
I am
.lilly.com/SEST[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/02/2002 11:28 AM
To:
"'Bradley W. Langhorst'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
how are u measuring read and write speeds?
-Original Message-
From: Vinay Kudithipudi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues
Hello Guys,
I am having some problems with configuring SAMBA wi
yes, secuirty=server is not a good option, it keeps your auth connection
even after auth is done, so thats the reason prob after a while password
serer was rejecting users,
you should monitor your windows password server as to what it is doing
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst
what
do you have in users.map file for clearcase_albd acct?
rm38144 is he part of group vob or view group?
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 02,
2002 10:55 AMTo: Bradley W. LanghorstCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROT
what
changed after august, any network changes
also
can you post your conf file
what
do you share via samba, clearcase vobs and views?
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 02,
2002 10:06 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc:
[EM
why do you have smbpasswd file, when you are in domain mode?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] solaris/2.2.2 authentication against NT domain (ie.
root canal)
Greetings
try with some other version of gcc and also compile some c program with
current version and see u get the same error
-Original Message-
From: abhishek kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: abhishek kumar
Subject: [Samba] Instal
Hi Keller, Barry
I am getting the same error even though i tried these settings.
The strange thing is am getting the error ,but the file is getting written
to unix share from windows
but i was wondering why the mysterious error,
am getting the error but lock file , i have manually clear on wind
Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] authentication question- pls respond
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>
> I am running samba-2.0.7 on solaris 2.6 in domain mode
> Windows clients are 98/nt/w2k
>
> I was just wondering if 2.0.7 supports NTLMv2
NO. Support for N
does it support solaris2.6 , for plain samba file servers
-Original Message-
From: Greg J. Zartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:37 PM
To: Bob Sully
Cc: Rasmus Reinholdt Nielsen; Brian McGraw; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Anyone using antivirus soft
I am running samba-2.0.7 on solaris 2.6 in domain mode
Windows clients are 98/nt/w2k
I was just wondering if 2.0.7 supports NTLMv2
I am asking this because lately some w2k clients are having issues with
authentication...
how do i check what if when client is requesting SMBnegprot to the serv
your new pc might have
configured for encryption where as samba might be plaintext
post your conf
file
-Original
Message-From: Tracy Jackson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002
2:13 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] Mapping
Drives from Windows
dont you think you should have ur dns servers in /etc/resolv.conf not wins
servers or if you gave wrong ips to me, then you should change conf file to
reflect that
-Original Message-
From: Terry Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
what are setting on samba servers as for as dns is concerned
like in /etc/resolv.conf
what version of samba
what unix version on samba
-Original Message-
From: Terry Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Re: DNS Proxy
yes it is required for write access
if you want just read access , you could add guest account option in conf
file.
other than that you need to have valid unix account to access the unix
share.
Others: Correct me if am wrong here :--)
ABdul Javid
-Original Message-
From: Geyer, Tho
am running samba-2.0.7 on solaris6
today am observing smbd is taking up lot of memory like for each connection
48M of which 45 mg is its using for heap
any idea, this not normal
thanks
Javid
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.o
I think Intel and Microsoft jointly developed SMB , i guess they still might
have patent on it
though microsoft changed SMB and called it CIFS.
-Original Message-
From: Sanjiv Bawa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Davide Dozza; Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc
which means samba cant be used in future with windows?
what other products out there which has no GPL license to interoperate with
windows
TAS?
-Original Message-
From: Davide Dozza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: samba
Thanks for the article
I was just wondering what this means to Samba
"The Microsoft license specifically excludes software under the General
Public License, commonly known as the GPL. The GPL is the software license
used by Linux and by SAMBA, a popular open-source program that allows
non-Microso
36 matches
Mail list logo
