[Samba] smbclient, kerberos, and EMC

2004-08-24 Thread Joey Collins
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to get smbclient to cooperate with my new EMC Celerra (just got it a little while ago) using kerberos. My windows domain environment is win2000 + sp4, the EMC is "joined" to the domain. I am using samba 3.0, fresh sources, and MIT KRB5 1.3.4, all freshly built. I join t

[Samba] Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-30 Thread Joey Collins
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote: > [snip] > > Also, sometimes I saw problems like "wbinfo -t" just says "secret is bad", > > when all the daemons were running. It sure was good at some point before. > > Samba periodially changes the password on the server. secrets.tdb should > be in sync with

[Samba] Error in SNIA spec wrt. SessionSetupAndX response when dialect is NT LM0.12

2003-01-02 Thread Joey Collins
Good evening, On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec (http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e., use "traditional" NTLMv2/NTLMv2 authentication w/o SecurityBlobs), the SessionSetu

Re: [Samba] NTLMv1 v. NTLMv2 ; more than one "identity" on a TCPconnection

2003-01-01 Thread Joey Collins
Thank you Andrew (and others) for your insight on this. Happy new year all, peace and thanks, Joey. Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 15:21, Joey Collins wrote: > > Hello, > > Two questions for you this evening. > > > > How do you tell the d

[Samba] NTLMv1 v. NTLMv2 ; more than one "identity" on a TCP connection

2002-12-30 Thread Joey Collins
Hello, Two questions for you this evening. How do you tell the difference between NTLMv1-style authentication and NTLMv2 style? The CIFS dialect NT LM 0.12 does both(?), so does not appear in the NegProtRequest message (nor in the flags, near as I could tell). Do you ascertain this by examinin