- Original Message -
From: Eddie Lania [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002
8:47 PM
I haven't got this to work altough I have read several mails now on this
list of people that seem to have it working.
I was wondering how this should be done.
I can start
Hi,
the attached patch (against HEAD) tries to cleanup the way well-known SIDs
are handled in the lookup_sid() and lookup_name() functions. With this
patch, the SID or name is first checked against a list of well-known SIDs.
If this failes, the SID or name is again checked against the list to see
Here comes the next version with the following changes:
1.) use SAM_ASSERT() some more
2.) implement context_sam_update_domain I forgot last time
3.) change the way context_sam_update_* and context_sam_delete_* find
their sam_methods. Use current_sam_methods from the handle
Kai
Hi,
This
- Original Message -
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrew Bartlett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kai Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: [PATCH] group control bits
Hi Jelmer, Hi Andrew, Hi Stefan
I've started to code up some functions to parse the lp_sam_backend list and
create a sam_context from it. In contrast to the current implementation,
these functions can take a domain name per backend and pass it down to the
apropriate sam_init(). To create a
Hi,
there is a missing , in default_classname_table[] between sam and
auth.
The appended patch fixes this.
Kai
typo.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
The appended patches try to cleanup the debug logs a little by grouping
debug messages together that belong together. I.e it removes the debug
headers inbetween. Not only does it reduce the log size (up to 20% depending
on debugleve), but IMHO also increases readability.
They affect
Here are some changes in codeing style of the first patches. Instead of
dbgtext(), DEBUGADD() is used. I've also reversed if conditions to avoid
whole of function if statements
Kai
util_sock_cleanup2.diff
Description: Binary data
util_cleanup2.diff
Description: Binary data
I assume the following lines in HEAD/source/libsmb/clispnego.c
if (neg_flags NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN)
DEBUG(4, ( NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN\n));
if (neg_flags NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN)
DEBUG(4, ( NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL\n));
should be
if
From: Kai Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002
10:21 PM
So now back to the structure of the handles. As mentioned before, I don't
think it has actually been decided upon (but perhaps I'm just not aware of
it). All opinions with reasons are therefore very welcome
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:09 AM
Kai Krueger wrote:
P.S. perhaps adding const all along would make it clear which parameters
are
in parameters and which are out paramters
Yes, that would be a very good idea
- Original Message -
From: Simo Sorce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Samba Technical [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi metze,
on top of the first doc I see you state that all strings should be utf8.
I hearteadly disagree, I woul d rather like to see all internal
Hi,
I'm haveing problems with the recent samba wins server after deleting the
wins.tdb. After restarting samba, the wins_server_subnet does not contain
all the names it should do (e.g. domain1b domain1c sambaserver00
sambaserver20 ...). If I use an old CVS checkout from the end of Mai
everything
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26,
2002 5:49 AM
It would be good, if all those q_u-pol could be renamed to
identify on what
type of sam-object each of the policies where opened. i.e.
q_u-domain_pol,
q_u-user_pol,
- Original Message -
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002
12:07 PM
My suggestion is something like the below. But it is more a thought till
now than a proper api
BOOL add_group_entry (GROUP_INFO1 group, BOOL local_global, DOM_SID
Hi,
I have just configured samba-3.0a13_1 with freebsd4.5. I am trying to
setup
a PDC I have followed the How-To and when logging in with a win2k client I
get the error:
There is no user session key for the specified logon session
I had the same problem for a long time and the Howto and man
Hi
Here comes the next part of the access control patch.
It fixes the nt_user_token in the pipes_struct and should therefore make the
whole patch function correctly so that it probably could then be applied.
Till now the current_user struct in pipes_struct was only initialised in the
code for
I've noticed two problems with enumerating aliases in srv_samr_nt.c.
The first problem is, that local unix groups only appear as aliases in win2k user
manager
if I have a debug level bigger than 2. I assume this is not a feature ?!? ;-)
The problem seams to be that the smb.conf parameter
This is the first version of the patch to implement access control to SAM.
It implements checks of the desired access in all open functions (those that create
handles)
against the appropriate default SDs of the previous patch and associates the granted
access bits
with the handle. These
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Access control to SAM / _samr_query_sec_obj
Nice patch. I do have one request though. I've (for years)
been removing magic numerical constants from Samba (like
the
Hi,
currently, as far as I can see, the access control to the SAM database is
only based upon file access to the db-files. On normal installations
therefore only the root user can change, delete or add things instead of the
entire administrators group. As this is IMHO rather unhelpfull,
21 matches
Mail list logo
