On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 06:26:05PM +0800, David Roid wrote:
> Sounds like domain membership is not in sync for your cluster, make sure
> smb.conf is identical and "net ads join" is executed on only one node after
> ctdb reaches stable state.
The smb.conf file is identical on the two servers becaus
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:03:25PM +0200, Daniel Müller wrote:
> Your both ctdb nodes have the same name and the same ip?
> Is winbind running: http://ctdb.samba.org/samba.html
> CTDB_MANAGES_WINBIND
> This is a parameter in /etc/sysconfig/ctdb
>
> When this parameter is set to "yes" CTDB will sta
Hi,
Is there any reason against making a ctdb connected 2 pc samba
cluster also a domain member? After setting the [include =
registry] option, one member of the cluster didn't let the users
to log in. If I relogin this cluster member to the domain, then
the other member starts to refuse users to l
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:39:09PM +0200, Kosa Attila wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What did I miss / do wrong? My config didn't work like on the
> below linked video:
> http://www.samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html
>
> With my config, the copy process fails/breaks des
Hi,
What did I miss / do wrong? My config didn't work like on the
below linked video:
http://www.samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html
With my config, the copy process fails/breaks despite that the
tesztxp PC successfully maps the other (samba) PC in case the
first (samba) PC is out. In
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:21:57PM +0200, Kosa Attila wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:11:45PM +0200, Kosa Attila wrote:
> >
> > I append the tcmpdump (egrep) issue and smb.conf-sambaversion.
>
> Sorry, stranded :)
Sorry, I don't send :(
http://members.chello.hu/k
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:11:45PM +0200, Kosa Attila wrote:
>
> Every test under running tcpdump:
> tcpdump -ni eth1 -w tcpdump.dmp
> tcpdump -ln -r tcpdump.dmp -s 0 -xX less 150 \
> | egrep "^SMB P" > tcpdump-sambaversion.dmp
>
> I append the tcmpdump (egre
Hello!
I testing samba and XP (file size ~14MB).
Copy, 2.2.3a-15 samba->XP (Explorer)
Packet Size (bytes) Count Packet Size (bytes) Count
1 to 75:4723 751 to 825: 66
76 to 150: 490 826 to 900: 1
151 to 225:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:07:56AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Kosa Attila wrote:
>
> >max xmit = 8192
> >block size = 4096
>
> Why have you changed these ? What was the purpose of doing so ?
> Just remove them fr
Hello!
Hardver: Windows XP Compaq Proliant DL360, Linux Compaq Proliant DL380.
2 pieces of processors Intel Xeon 3,2GHz, 2GB RAM, 6 gigabit interface
(2 tg3, 4 e1000), Debian Woody, 2.4.31 vanilla kernel. 6 U320 SCSI
15krpm HDD, 2 HDD RAID1 system, 4 HDD RAID1+0 data. Every network cards
connect
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:54:03PM -0600, Liz Ackerman wrote:
>
> [accting]
> comment = Accounting Volume
> path = /accting
> writeable = yes
> valid users = a list of valid users
> level2 oplocks = no
> veto oplock files = /*.*db/*.ldb/*.mde/*.xls/*.QB*/*.*/
> blocking locks = no
> lockin
11 matches
Mail list logo
