2 23:47, schrieb Massimiliano Perantoni:
>
>> Hi,
>> could you send me the setup?
>> Which lines did you add?
>> Whici distro do you run?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Il 31 marzo 2012 22:11, Stephan ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Am 31.03.2012 20:56, s
Hi,
could you send me the setup?
Which lines did you add?
Whici distro do you run?
Thanks!
Il 31 marzo 2012 22:11, Stephan ha scritto:
> Am 31.03.2012 20:56, schrieb Steve Thompson:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
>>
>>> Well, did not try, bu
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
Il 31 marzo 2012 19:04, Steve Thompson ha scritto:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
>
>> I'm exactly using that, without luck...
&g
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
--
Massimiliano Perantoni
site: http://www.perantoni.net
Il 31 marzo 2012 15:35, Steve Thompson ha scritto:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>
>> I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
>
k Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
> backends. You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and
> samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
> On Beh
Hi,
I have a quite "simple" setup for a particular customer that loves
redundancy and failover.
PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node +
several samba member servers
Actually pointing singularly on both the systems everything works great.
As soon as I modify my passdb back
