On Mar 3, 2005, at 7:29 PM, David Bowsky wrote:
Could anyone point me to some information regarding managing these
files in a
Windows/OS X environment? Is there some way to base veto's on user or
group
IDs? For example, could I generate a group for my mac users and then
veto
._files for everyon
On Jan 11, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Patrick McSwiggen wrote:
So if you don't want the o+r bit set use:
create mask 0770
If you now want to force ug+rwx permissions for all files, *also* use:
force create mode 0770
and I also left off the equal signs--make these:
create mask = 0770
force create
On Jan 11, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Patrick McSwiggen wrote:
So if you don't want the o+r bit set use:
create mask 0770
If you now want to force ug+rwx permissions for all files, *also* use:
force create mode 0770
and I also left off the equal signs--make these:
create mask = 0770
force create
On Jan 11, 2005, at 4:13 AM, Patrick DUBAU wrote:
Thanks Bart for your answer.
I did what you say force create mode = 0770 (default creat mask =
0744)
but the files that are created are still with the rights rwx rwx r--
Strange !
Bart Hendrix a écrit :
Hi Patrick,
Try to use the following in yo
On Nov 14, 2004, at 9:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Windows, User 1 will see the shares listed in
/etc/samba/smb.User1.conf.
User 2 will not see those shares (unless they are listed in User 2's
directory
file as well, which in my case never happens).
In Mac OS X (10.3.4, 10.3.5, and 10.3.6)
On Sep 14, 2004, at 8:46 PM, Matthew Western, IT Support, Lonsdale
wrote:
Basically we have a share called data.When trying to access the
share from second copy the log says can't see service 'dat'.
Bizzaire
Did you try duplicating the share but this time calling it [dat] (make
it "browse
