Enrique Sanchez Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this might be better, since your working config file
> does not get overwritten by accident.
That's not an issue in my case, since I'm installing into an empty
prefix. I just want to understand why it acted differently this time.
2.2.3a was the f
I just installed 2.2.4 into an initially empty prefix, and there is no
smb.conf in .../lib. Should I worry? When I installed 2.2.3a
similarly, it installed its own smb.conf.
paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailm
