Kris Lou wrote:
PDC Results:
SID for local machine KIF is: S-1-5-21-1297059763-2273326489-166094
SID for domain MLC is: S-1-5-21-957249707-1866601452-441284377
Openfiler Results:
SID for local machine VADER is: S-1-5-21-2859034502-3981372097-2611941478
SID for domain MLC is:
, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Rob Shinn mor...@tuxedo.darktech.org wrote:
Kris Lou wrote:
I've checked my ldif's - the groups exist, the users exists as
memberids, but it looks like samba is only checking the gid?
Can you post the LDIFs of your groups (you can edit out any incriminating
evidence
Kris Lou wrote:
I've checked my ldif's - the groups exist, the users exists as
memberids, but it looks like samba is only checking the gid?
Can you post the LDIFs of your groups (you can edit out any
incriminating evidence ;)? Sounds like your groups are lacking correct
sambaSID or
Michael Lueck wrote:
When Etch came out, the Samba packages were so bad that I ended up
trying Ubuntu (7.04). It worked great!
That's just silly. I use Ubuntu on my desktops and servers mostly
because I prefer the extra fit-and-polish it has to Debian. But I've
used both and the packages
Alberto Moreno wrote:
Is possible to sync both ldap servers every time I change something
in ldap? or a better way to do it?Alberto Moreno wrote:
You could probably do this with OpenLDAP's syncrepl replication
facility. You may also wish to consider combining everything into one
LDAP database,
Alberto Moreno wrote:
Is possible to sync both ldap servers every time I change something
in ldap? or a better way to do it?Alberto Moreno wrote:
You could probably do this with OpenLDAP's syncrepl replication
facility. You may also wish to consider combining everything into one
LDAP
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think one user in LDAP could be in two different domains-
each user has to have a distinct SambaSID entry.
Ooomph! *slaps forehead*. You're right. That's what I get for posting
before I've had my coffeee.
I stand by my original statement that OpenLDAP's
Kacper wrote:
The file exists there but is of course read-only. Does samba need to
write to this secret file or why doesn't it want to open that file?
If you want your root filesystem read-only (like, say, to boot your
server from a CD-ROM or embedded device) then you can just copy this
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
Of over 100 LADP Samba installation I have completed over 80%
successfully use:
uid='username',ou=People,ou=Users,ldap_base_dn
uid='machine',ou=Computers,ou=Users,ldap_base_dn
Same here, though I use
uid='username', ou=people, ldap_base_dn
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:34:51PM -0500, Himanshu Thapar wrote:
Thank youOkay..can you explain how can I go about with hdparm or
guide me to an appropriate link. Also how will this help me in diagnosing
the current
Don't know if this helps, but you _can_ add a description in CUPS and
Samba clients will display it.
On 2/13/09, HB ciradhb.forw...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi
I have a Samba 3.2.7 acting as a PDC for files and printers sharing.
All the print configuration is ok and network printers shared by Samba
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Kathy banshee...@gmail.com wrote:
# first statement is old and may not be obsolete but we still keep it
just in case
oplocks = no
kernel oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
If you have 'oplocks = no', then it doesn't matter what 'kernel oplocks' or
'level2
Do you have a complete sambaDomain record in your LDAP and is it at
the root level of the LDAP structure?
On 12/19/08, Graham Seaman g.sea...@lse.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to set up samba with ldap authorization on a windows network.
I have samba running on one linux host, and openldap on
You shouldn't need one, but running one won't really hurt either.
On 12/11/08, Uriel Avalos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. All, I've been reading the docs but I'm not too sure when I should run a
WINS server.
Just to confirm, I only need a WINS server if I have more than one
workgroup? or more
There are no options that aren't a security nightmare other than using
different hostnames for each OS.
On 12/11/08, Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
We are facing a boring trouble with multi OB boot machines
that access to our samba server.
All machines authenticate to samba PDC
their hostname,
they'll be able to browse but not share).
@Doug@ - So going w/o a WINS server works even if I use different
workgroups? Sweet...
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:55:39AM -0500, Rob Shinn wrote:
You shouldn't need one, but running one won't really hurt either.
On 12/11/08, Uriel Avalos
workgroups? Sweet...
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:55:39AM -0500, Rob Shinn wrote:
You shouldn't need one, but running one won't really hurt either.
On 12/11/08, Uriel Avalos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. All, I've been reading the docs but I'm not too sure when I should
run a
WINS server
Sounds like something at the physical layer. Try a different NIC on
the server. Run some network diagnostics.
On 12/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's reliable and Samba is working on another machine just fine. That
box is running Samba 3.0.20 on Slackware. This is
On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:12 pm, Michael Heydon wrote:
This is what happens when you rename a user, it is the same in XP and
probably 2k as well. The only way that I know of to really change a
No, this does not happen on Windows 2000. Note that I'm still running
Windows 2000 because it runs
On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:54 pm, Chris wrote:
This used to work.
net groupmap list shows that the mapping is there, and the SID looks
correct.
When I check the user after logging into the Windows 2000 workstation
with WHOAMI.EXE /GROUP the DOMAIN\Admins group is listed, but when I
log in
Symlinks are causing my the Linux CIFS v1.47 client to fail with
Samba 3.0.24 with Unix Extensions turned on. The messages I am getting
are in the syslog are:
Jul 30 21:22:05 dagda kernel: [88044.98] CIFS VFS: server not
responding
Jul 30 21:22:05 dagda kernel: [88044.98] CIFS
Why is that when you create a share, the default is 'msdfs root = yes'?
Also, why is that a share that is set 'msdfs root = yes' -- or, rather,
a share that does /not/ set 'msdfs root = no' -- advertises that it is a
DFS root to the Linux CIFS client, /even /when 'host msdfs = no'? This
sounds
Hi everyone--
I've worked with many, many CAD, CAM and PLM products including AutoCAD,
CATIA, I-DEAS, UG/NX, 3DStudio Max, Teamcenter, etc. for many, many years
and consider myself to be an expert in performance, scalability and
reliability of these systems.
Most likely, your problems are not
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Fabio Muzzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a user logs on, I would like to run a script that modifies firewall
rules based on the group that the user belongs to (this determines if he
has internet access or not) and based on the workstation's IP address
(so I
Copied to list. (Forgot to hit 'Reply All'_
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Rob Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can ping each server's IP from the other server. The following nmblookup
commands both work:
Hi, Misty:
The all-important question is not whether you can ping each server's
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:54 PM, William W. Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer.
At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake.
While this may be a question better suited to the OpenSUSE list than this
one, you
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I converted our networks to samba a decade or more ago, I started
out by trying to crack all our user passwords by brute force, but I
could only get about 90% of them in any reasonable time frame. So,
Wow. *Only* 90%.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rob Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Files over 4GB not listing properly. Cannot get
CIFSworking.
To: Matt Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, I cannot mount the samba share using CIFS. I use the line
28 matches
Mail list logo
