On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Basically if re-training your SPAM filter does not help and
> one really wants to get rid of all those junk mails, installing
> a challenge/response system like TMDA behind a statistical
> filter (e.g. DSPAM) would be a possible solution ...
Please don't do
On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> All
>
> Has any consideration been made to converting the list to a forum? in that
> way everyone can just check the web site instead of checking the
> inbox? For those folk who rather read the mail most forum software can
Somewhat off-topic for the list,
On February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> rpcclient $> adddriver "Windows NT x86" "HP CLJ 8500 -
> PCL":NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
> result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
> rpcclient $> adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP CLJ 8500 -
> PCL":NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
> Printer Driver HP CLJ 85
rpcclient $> adddriver "Windows NT x86" "HP CLJ 8500 -
PCL":NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
rpcclient $> adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP CLJ 8500 -
PCL":NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
Printer Driver HP CLJ 8500 - PCL successfully installed.
rpcclient $>
This
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If you download the cups source and unzip it, you will find a file called cups.spec
>in the top
> level dir of the source. You can pass the spec file to rpm (or rpmbuild on newer
>redhat systems)
> and it will create an rpm for you out of the dowloaded
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Hmm ... couldn't seem to find it on the cups site (google couldn't either)
It's the first hit on google. I've no idea what you're trying to
search for. http://www.google.com/search?q=cups
> What are your opinions on this strategy?
If you don't build a
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Any idea where I can find a REdHat7.3 rpm for 1.1.18?
>
> I can't find one anywhere
try the cups website, or build from source.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"even when american adverts try for the oblique and wordles
On February 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> didn't hear anything back on this, so i'm trying again:
>
> --
> i would bet someone's already asked and had this
> answered, but since the archives of these listss aren't
> searchable, and since i couldn't find the info in the
> docs or elsewhere
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I presume that's output from "ls -l". I would hazard a guess that your
> > server and client clocks are not in sync. If you're on linux, try ls
> > --full-time
>
> Yes! It's "ls -l" output I've posted.
>
> And yes again, client and server are not in syn
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> And, here what I have!!! : First file has NO PROBLEM, second one HAS
> "READ ONLY" ERROR, (but not if the file is REOPEN again):
>
> -rw-rw-r--1 nobody nogroup 37888 Feb 14 11:46 test_file_1.doc
> -rwxr--r--1 nobody nogroup 37376 Feb 1
On February 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If "newbs" tend to ask the same questions over and over and you
> don't like to see what they wrote, delete it. You don't have to respond
> and it's not that big of a deal to take a second to read something that
> you have no intention of responding p
On February 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This is puzzling me (and hampering some work, slightly):
>
> NT4SP6 + full updates server, with some printers attached.
Woopsy, forgot to mention:
Samba HEAD. Administrative user, joined to the domain, in printer
admins group, etc.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[E
This is puzzling me (and hampering some work, slightly):
NT4SP6 + full updates server, with some printers attached.
"rpcclient -U admin%pass enumdrivers 2" server gives me a list of stuff
like this:
[Windows 4.0]
Printer Driver Info 2:
Version: [0]
Driver Name: [HP LaserJet 5Si P
On February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I just tried to set an acl on "take ownership" it doesn't stick - it
> should.
> Read and write attributes does stick.
Thanks, that's what I'd seen myself. I guess it's not supported at
present.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very per
On February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> you don't need ACL support for unix style permissions
> (user, group, world)
> ACLs are lists of arbitrary users that have the specified permissions on
> the files you choose.
You do if you want more than one set of user/group acls per file.
Waider.
--
[E
I've tried to determine this empirically, but have run foul of config
issues that won't be resolved in the immediate future. Basically, I
know that Samba + ACL + an acl-aware filesystem will allow me to
assign unix-style permissions to arbitrary groups of people for a
given file. However, Windows h
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The linux box can see the large Windows files, but does not see their
>
> correct sizes -- it reports an absurdly big size when using ls -l. Files
> less
>
> that 2GB show up correctly. Trying to create a 3G file on the Windows box
>
> from the linux box
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I don't have HPUX, so I don't know what to suggest for that. I just know
> getent won't work without winbindd in nsswitch.conf on Linux.
I think the point that was being made is that NSS support on HPUX only
supports a few known types, of which one is LDAP.
On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID
> as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not
> that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major
> Hardware failure.)
>
On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
> as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?
Yes, search the archives for the procedure I posted on Nov 25 or
thereabouts.
The only "problem" as such is that if you need to keep the P
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Is there any work in progress to fix that problem? I'm running Linux
> 2.4.20 and SuSE 8.1 installed samba 2.2.5 but I've also played with
> samba-2.2-cvs as of today.
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ ver
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> i made some minor changes to the migrationtools to work properly. (some
> atrribute types are spelled wrong)
What changes? Seems like it might be worthwhile telling the people on
this list, if not the people at padl, about the errors.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> rpm -q --requires samba-2.2.7a-2mdk.src.rpm
durr. should have been "rpm -q -requires samba"
and you'd have to do it for samba-common, samba-swat, and whatever
else.
and then you'd have to post-process the results to see what provides
each requirement.
so
On January 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am in the process of authoring a Samba-LDAP-PDC HOWTO for Mandrake
> users that will allow cross platform ( Linux / M$ ) network user
> authentication. Lastnight I ran
> rpm --rebuild --with ldap samba-2.2.7a-2mdk.src.rpm
> and it produced a list of pac
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 1. What packages/ports do I need to install? Because most papers of LDAP
> online I could find mentioned little about Openssl. However, as I know,
> it's necessary for the option "ldap ssl = start_tls" in Samba . Also, I
> didn't find any ports of nss_lda
On January 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am very interested in this "net rpc" command. Where can I find out
> more about it?
>
> Jim C.
I'd suggest trawling the Samba lists. I posted a howto some time ago
for cloning a PDC using the smbpasswd backend.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /
Continuing the saga:
Groups are not migrated by the ldap_nua backend, even if I create a
posixGroup entry. After a bit of prodding, I found the latter was
because Samba had set up group mappings in group_mapping.tdb, which my
manually-created LDAP groups didn't agree with. Removing
group_mapping.td
On January 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> sort of change in status. The only major caveat I've found is that
> because net rpc vampire does a getpwnam_alloc() immediately after
> account creation, which fails in my case because I'm using ldap_nua as
> my backend so getpwnam_alloc() will /always/ fai
This patch allows net rpc vampire to create accounts in the same way
that smbpasswd does, i.e. it will attempt to use the appropriate
account creation function for the backend in use. From reading the
comments on the top of the local_password_change function, either I
shouldn't be going this route
On January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> At this point I am suspecting that it's expecting an LDAP account to
> exist already because I'm using sam backend = ldap. I'll try ldap_nua
> to see if it improves things, but if anyone can interrupt me and tell
> me what I'm missing I'd appreciate it.
Rig
still digging at this:
[2003/01/20 14:26:38, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_connect_system(421)
ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server
[2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_open(472)
The LDAP server is succesful connected
[2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_lda
On January 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Well, it is not called stable and surely there are still a lot of bugs
> somewhere. We've migrated our ~700 user network from ActiveDirectory to
> samba 3.0 about one month ago, and up to now there are surprisingly few
> problems (3.0 is running on our Domai
On January 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 3) from a console (or, in case you have no GUI), you type 'ntsysv'.
> Again, this gives you a list of services and checkboxes; tick off 'smb'.
And perhaps the best way, since it's the (current) Red Hat preferred
method:
open a console/root terminal and e
On January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> mmm
> Perhaps we should do this a bit differently then for the smbldap
> scripts, eh?
>
> when samba gives the machine name in %u, does it trail a dollar sign on
> it? or does it just give the machine name alone?
Dunno, I've not traced it. I'm guessing it
On January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> samba is calling the 'add user script' option for creating machine
> accounts. does the 'add machine script' option exist in 2.2.7?
Nope, it's new for Samba 3.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"i do this some times
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:06:04AM -0600, Darin Bawden wrote:
> > Greetings everyone,
> > Just a quick question, I hope. I installed the 3.0 alpha for an RH 8.0 test
> > server. In the smb.conf file I have printing=cups and printcap=cups. In
>
> should th
On January 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am assuming that you edited the /etc/passwd file via vi or another text
> editor? If this is the case, appending a $ to the machine account will not
> work under FreeBSD. Instead as root type vipw and then append the $ to the
> machine account. I have do
On January 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 03:07, Ronan Waide wrote:
>
> > noauto,user
> > only root can unmount these partitions after they've been mounted.
>
> You could try using the parameter "users", not "user" (the d
On January 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Try sudo. Put a line into sudoers that allows your users to only use the
> command mount -t smbfs /// /home//music
For user-level mounts, try adding the 'user' flag to the fstab:
//pdc/d /mnt/tmpsmbfs noauto,user 0 0
This will prompt t
On January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Indeed, Mr. Waide's answer should suffice; however, before you take the
> opportunity of creating that file, you may want to look in /etc/xinetd.d
> to see if there is a file called "swat". If that file is there, then
> you only need edit that file and chang
On January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am running a Samba Server on a 7.0 Linux machine.
> I am having poor luck in enabling SWAT. As this machine
> has no inetd.conf file but instead has a xinetd.conf file.
> To this file I have added the line:
>
> swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/sbin/swa
On January 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > * desktop.ini weirdness in profiles
> > I've seen this mentioned a few times with no sign of a real
> > solution.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this - given that what gets uploaded into
I believe Dragan Karnic (sp? sorry, don't have the name to ha
Hi sambafolks,
I see a number of topics cropping up here repeatedly over the last few
weeks:
* Files > 4GB not supported
This is confirmed and solved in 2.2.7a, but not in the current
incarnation of smbfs (which is not part of samba, I know, but will
get discussed here as a related topic)
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Check the code for nmbd. You will see that it is essential that nmbd
> listens on all interfaces. That means it can reply to requests also. It
> will NOT broadcast on interfaces that are excluded from the interfaces
> specification if "bind interfaces only
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Check that this says:
>
> interfaces = eth0 lo
>
> where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
> find it's name run 'ifconfig -a'
I'd realised that. I'm not exactly a newcomer to unix/samba :)
> What is the output of 'n
On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Try adding to smb.conf [globals]:
>
> interfaces = eth0 loOB
> bind interfaces only = Yes
Digging up this thread again:
the current redhat version of samba seems to disregard the setting of
'bind interfaces only', as I'm still getting occa
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Someone (who is on my email address list) said I sent an email with an
> attachment saying something about "Here is a game, I hope you should like
> it."
>
> If you receive any emails from me with an attachment be sure not to open it.
> It's a virus of
Okay, it appears that something in my patches (unposted!) breaks the
NFS daemon in such a way as to cause oopses. This is not good, so I'll
see if I can debug it before offering the patches for general
consumption.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"It's in
On December 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It would be a tremendous help for all newbies and other migrants if
> someone lurking on this maillist went a step further than I did and
> were willing to share the experience.
I'm currently looking at exactly this setup in order to migrate some
shares o
On December 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> usage. There's something about the way Linux tends to use
> up all of the memory available that I find strange compared
> to commercial *nices. But to go overboard and claim swap
Solaris does this also. Only since 2.7 (I think) have you been able to
find o
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Waider,
> Would you mind commenting further on what you had to do to get RedHat 8.0
> support ACLs.
>
> Thanks
> K.C.
Sure:
* Download kernel SRPM
* Modify patches[1]
* Spend several hours rebuilding kernel packages
[1] is obviously the tricky bit. I'm t
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Well, I thought I had "bind interfaces only = Yes" but it is commented
> out. I commented out the interfaces lines and restarted Samba. Now
Red Hat 7.3
samba-2.2.7-1.7.3
with the interfaces line, there's still a listener on the ppp0
interface (the one I d
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, alan brown wrote:
> Could not find a valid trust path to the key. Let's see whether we can
> assign some missing owner trust values.
> No path leading to one of our keys found
> gpg: Warning: This key is not certified with a trusted signature.
> Gpg: There is no indication tha
For the record, stock RedHat 7.3 kernel (2.4.18-18.7.x) supports files
greater than 2GB.
Rather than debating the point as to whether various things
theoretically support > 2GB files or not, it's rather easy to
empirically determine support using dd to create a file greater than
2GB.
Just my $.02
On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Just having a senior moment here, but, I recall vaguely that samba will
> listening on all NIC's but ignores the ones you tell it to ignore with.
>
> Joel
Hmm. My home network config has samba configured to only listen on the
internal network, but nmb see
On December 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Is there a way to configure Samba so that all password authentication is
> done through the Windows domain controllers?
>
I presume you mean all samba authentication: join your server to the
domain. This is covered pretty exhaustively in the documentatio
On December 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
> think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
> fileutils, etc. I'm currently rebuilding various bits and pieces to
> see if I can make it work without too much grief.
Ok
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> So it looks like the option is turned on in the kernel config, but the
> patch is not actually in the kernel.
No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
fileutils, e
On December 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
> > enabled by default.
>
> I installed RedHat 8.0 and acl on ext2/3 didn't work, with the precompiled
> Kernel from SGI and xfs acl work fine.
Yup, this is why I said "appear to have"
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
> bestbits.
>
> xfs is a better choice and has the acl stuff built in.
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
enabled by default.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PRO
On December 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> The trouble is that if you enable this for any shared file space, your MS
> Windows client applications will break.
I think the point he was making is that he's using it solely for
Linux-to-Linux communication, which I think is the wrong tool for the
job
On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact
> that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be
> ashamed of but rather reason to be proud.
I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this
opinion, es
Hi Folks,
as promised, here's what I did to get net rpc vampire working. There's
a question at the bottom that someone might be able to answer for
me. If the detail below is sane, I'll tidy it up some and submit it as
a proper HOWTO. If not, please tell me where I'm being insane :)
==
On November 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, adam morley wrote:
>
> > my problem is that while nmblookup is reading smb.conf (see attached
> > strace) its not honoring the name resolve order line and checking with
> > the wins
On November 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> This feature was possible in Win2K but disabled by default, in WinXP it is
> enabled by default. It is necessary to turn it off in XP if you want to
> connect with NT4 servers also.
Aha, so if I have an NT4 server already I should consider this a
non-is
On November 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> You need to disable "RequiresSignorSeal" in the registry. If you check the
> Samba source tarball, ~samba/docs/Registry/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg is the
> file you need to double-click on in XP to turn off this feature. The other
> way is to use the Security
On November 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Thanks for those utiltiies...I knew i saw them somewhere...I was successful
> in creating a smbpasswd file using the pwdump utility..
>
> Now here is my question (maybe someone know a work around):
>
> If a username/password pair exists in the smbpasswd f
On November 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Sorry for all the newbie questions...
>
> I could have sworn I saw something about a utility that exports the SAM
> database from NT into Linux..
> seems like it is the lego syndrome, saw it while doing WINBIND searches,
> can't find it elsewise...anyway..
On November 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> If you want to contribute some doco or simply a discussion of what you
> did and how you did it, it would be most appreciated.
Certainly will do. Once I get it working and all :)
> You must use the 'add user' scripts etc - because we don't automatical
On November 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It should work, once you get the SIDs right, for users at least
> (assuming ldap or rsynced smbpasswd). Other things are harder to get
> synced across correctly.
>
> There is some (slightly out date) documentation in the source disto.
I'm fighting wit
70 matches
Mail list logo
