I have a RHEL 5 server using Samba (but not Winbind, reporting the
version as 3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4) serving profiles via:
[profile]
comment = Profile directory - special share
invalid users = nobody
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
read only = no
force directory mode = 0700
the one I was querying about).
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:00 AM
> To: Stewart, Eric
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] 3.0.23 and group behavior
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
Okay, first the admisssions:
I'll admit that I haven't been following the development as
closely as I probably should have. And I'll admit in this case I might
not be using Samba in the most efficient way possible. Also, I'm not
100% sure if I'm encountering a bug or just a seriou
CTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 3:54 AM
> To: Stewart, Eric
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:42:33PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
> > If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
If someone has this working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, I'd
like a few pointers.
I've changed "defaults" in /etc/fstab for the affected partition
to "defaults,acl,user_xattr" and rebooted the box. I've gone so far as
to make sure all processes were killed, remove the samba sbin,
RHEL 3 AS here - test box (via VPN - I'm so interested in this
issue that I'm working on it from home) gave same behavior.
Jeremy got an email from me this morning with log files,
configuration file, getfacl's, ls -la, and an ldd of smbd showing that
the ACL lib was compiled in. Tr
u'll
get another annoying message from me.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 6:28 PM
> To: Stewart, Eric
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
>
> On Fri,
6:28 PM
To: Stewart, Eric
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:49:47PM -0400, Stewart, Eric wrote:
>
> Ignoring the minor issue of the created files perms not matching
the
> force create mode (I know it's now an
Okay:
3.0.14a RHEL 3, client is a Windows 2003 Server SP 1. Simple
(minimally sanitized) configuration using Winbind and Samba:
= Begin Config =
[global]
load printers = no
guest account = nobody
hosts allow = (our local ranges)
workgroup = (our domain)
secur
I'm pretty sure I did (though it's Friday and I have a
significantly shorter attention span/less attention for detail) and I
sent you (JRA directly) logfiles and a configuration file for a 3.0.14a
test on RHEL 3.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
This sounds like the problem I was having as touched upon in my
thread:
Samba 3.0.13 and deleting files
I sent JRA a set of log level 10 logs (all 10 MB worth for a
short test, so they wouldn't go through to this list). Mind you he's a
busy guy and may not have even gotten to the
Tripwire seems to freak out a bit during DST changes on my
Windows boxes; the timestamps on a lot of the files change by an hour
one way or the other (depending on which switch of DST it is).
So it's a Windows problem as far as I know, but I don't know of
a fix.
> -Original Mes
I haven't seen a solution yet, but here's what I'm running into:
3.0.13 with Winbind on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3, compiled with
--with-pam as well as attempts with that and --with-acl-support - note
that though the samba server is a member of a 2003 AD but not using "net
ads" but "net rpc
Samba 3.0.11 with Winbind running on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3,
compiled with --with-pam (possibly another argument that I can't
remember at this second).
I applied it to my DC that is playing the PDC role today and all
of a sudden Winbind could not enumerate any Active Directory
i
Clients are Windows 2000; server is running Samba version
3.0.2a. We've been a W2K shop for some time but have started to get in
a few Windows XP systems (principally laptops). The issue we're
experiencing with the Win XP machines is that they can't map the homes
share, either through a V
Clients are Windows 2000; server is running Samba version
3.0.2a. We're experiencing a sporadic issue with the homes share
occasionally coming up missing. All other shares remain mappable and
accessable. If the workstation is rebooted, it can once again access
the share.
This is
0/03 Chankanaab Park, Cozumel
GeoCacher:58 Found Most Recent: 07/04/03 GCGBHE - Fun in the Sun
http://www.scubadiving.com/talk/ and http://www.geocaching.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Stewart, Eric
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
...
Eric Stewart - Network Admin - USF Tampa Library - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCUBA Diver: 220 Dives Most Recent: 05/10/03 Chankanaab Park, Cozumel
GeoCacher:58 Found Most Recent: 07/04/03 GCGBHE - Fun in the Sun
http://www.scubadiving.com/talk/ and http://www.geocaching.com/
> -Original Messa
I have a RedHat Linux 9 server that I would like to allow users in my Windows
2000 domain to be able to map shares from without actually having an account on the
system. Compiled samba, configured with "./configure --with-pam". Got the server
into the domain, and regular "security = do
Title: Windows 2000 Domain Controller Security Setting
I sent an email last night regarding a security issue we were having with our Windows 2000 domain controllers and Samba's interaction with them.
It turns out part of the issue is that security settings don't propagate to t
20 matches
Mail list logo
