OA oktay.ak...@abwesend.de wrote:
Is SMB2 enabled?
I don't think so, I do not have a protocol option in smb.conf and
according to its manpage NT1 is still the default.
Sven
--
Der wichtigste Aspekt, den Sie vor der Entscheidung für ein Open
Source-Betriebssystem bedenken sollten, ist, dass
Hello,
after upgrading from Samba 3.5.6 to 3.6.5 I encounter some strange
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED trouble when trying to access group readable
directories from Windows 7 or Windows 2008 Terminal Server.
Very strange stuff is that it works fine using smbclient from a Linux
machine using the same
Quinn Plattel qie...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is great that samba4 has a single sign on solution for Windows
platforms and it seems to work well too, but I am wondering is it possible
to do the same for a Linux environment?
I have a working single sign on solution running using Active
Hello,
for some strange reason I can not get quota to work with Samba 3.5.8.
The quoata system itself works fine (using repquota /mountpoint) and via
NFS, but Samba does not report the correct free space (df command in
smbclient).
Instead the real free space on the disk volume is shown to smb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'll can change ACLs, if i'm the owner of this file/folder. If I'm
member of an ownerproup or I have full access via ACLs (as user or as a
member of a group) I always get an error message:
setfacl: test_unixgrpvoll: Operation not permitted
RTFL hels in
Dear Samba List,
I just updated my samba setup from an older Version (3.0.22) to 3.0.24
(Debian Version).
Now unfortunately valid users does not work anymore.
I have a Samba Server with security=ADS (win 2003 SP2 Domain Controller) in
an all local Unix Users Setup!
Thus all my usernames are
