Another shot in the dark . . . .
and I don't believe you've stated what fs type your using, but have you
tried storing the data using other fs types or playing with the mount
options?
-
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
[EMA
Solaris has no problems running samba. But it sounds like you have both
samba2 & samba3 installed to different locations. You need to verify this
& sort it out.
-
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
440-483-532
My crude hack at a solution, but it works for me so here goes . . . . .
#!/bin/sh
# /usr/local/bin/get_grp_mem
#
# is derived from:
#
# wbinfo -n
#
# S-1-2-33-44-5-6-X User (1)
#
# = S-1-2-33-44-5-6
#
grpid=`wbinfo -n $1 | sed 's/-//' | sed '
;.
That being said, I've had good luck with it personally, but don't yell
at me if a bug in it causes data loss!
Regards,
Ryan
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 09:10 -0400, Tobias Bluhm wrote:
> I gotta put my vote in for ext3. While it is slower than the other fs's:
>
> - It'
I gotta put my vote in for ext3. While it is slower than the other fs's:
- It's robust. I've researched this & it seems you can bash ext3/2 pretty
hard & still recover data. I saw too many stories of lost data on the
other fs's for my liking.
- It's fully supported. ACL, xattr, quota, LVM snaps
>
> Tobias Bluhm philips.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Jeremy wrote on 06/29/2005 05:38:11 AM:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'm having some annoying problems with symbolic links. I'm
not
> > > certain
Jeremy wrote on 06/29/2005 05:38:11 AM:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm having some annoying problems with symbolic links. I'm not
> certain they relate to samba but hopefully sone here can help
> anyway.
>
>I have a linux ( Mandrake 10.1 ) machine sharing various
directories
cc: (bcc: Tobias Bluhm/CLE/MS/PHILIPS)
Subject:Re: [Samba] Re: sharing NFS mounts
Classification:
True, would be good to share both SMB and NFS from the same
server. However, there is a possible reason to use SMB from NFS client
mount point: Win clients canno
>that it's 'safe' to add msdfs support to an existing server
That's how I did it.
>I'm still on 2.2.8a if it makes any difference - for the moment I'm
I can't speak too much about 2.x , been on 3.x for a while now. But the
samba server on the nfs box will need to tie in to the same user
authe
rver\share.
-
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
440-483-5323
Simon Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/25/2005 08:58 AM
To: Tobias Bluhm/CLE/MS/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
samba@lists.samba.org
cc:
Subject:Re: [Samba] msdfs (Was
. . . . Also . . is nfslock is running?
-
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
440-483-5323
Tobias Bluhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/25/2005 08:25 AM
To:
m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/24/2005 06:04 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
cc: (bcc: Tobias Bluhm/CLE/MS/PHILIPS)
Subject:[Samba] smb an NFS dir?
Classification:
I have /home nfs mounted from a NFS server to /home
samba@lists.samba.org
cc: (bcc: Tobias Bluhm/CLE/MS/PHILIPS)
Subject:[Samba] Samba and Window 2003
Classification:
I am trying to find a good how-to on setting up samba to use Windows 2003
for authentication, if anyone knows of a good link let me know. I
PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/24/2004 12:12 PM
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Tobias Bluhm/CLE/MS/PHILIPS)
Subject:[Samba] Pointer to ACL enabled Red Hat 9 kernel RPM?
Classifica
14 matches
Mail list logo
