earch for "samba ldap".
Regards Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Am 07.04.10 22:44, schrieb Gary Dale:
> How do I mount an smb/cifs share as a normal user without running
> mount.cifs? Or if I have to mount the share as root, how can I get
> reasonable access to the shares?
Use FUSE.
Regards Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the followin
James Peach schrieb:
2009/7/16 Udo Mueller :
Anyone knows why this doesnt work with mac os x?
try "unix extensions = no"
Will try it and come back later.
TY
Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailm
directories created with 2700 or 0770 or 0700
My setup works just perfect with Windows Clients.
Anyone knows why this doesnt work with mac os x?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Udo Müller
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org
o our Win2k3 domain controllers?
well, I have to agree with the second response you got. LDAP or let's
say "any" replicable & (load) balancable database storage is far better
than a local file based storage.
I've done many installations and even for the smallest ones
gy, and very possible just not possible [see the recent
> ppolicy related thread]. Making use of technologies like Kerberos is
> really awkward.
I disagree. The only problem ie. with Kerberos is that there are so many
weird and misleading so called "HOWTOs" on the net (that shou
this be an acceptable solution? If so, could I reroute
> (symlink) /usr/bin/passwd to smbpasswd so that users would be forced to use
> smbpasswd? I'm not really sure of another way to enforce this..
You basically have two options:
#1 as said, use smbpasswd instead of passwd
#2 use t
se - muchmuch cheaper due to the lack of license
costs
just some initial thoughts ...
For more technical information check the samba HP and/or one of the many
comparisons you will find on the net.
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at
signature.asc
the home directory for a user created with
> the proper ownership the first time the user signs in? Is there any kind
> of script that can be invoked on the DMS? Is there any way winbind can
> create the home directory when it creates the UID/GID for the user?
use pam_mkhomedir for that p
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 12:66 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>> Udo Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/27/08 8:37 AM >>>
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 08:05 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am developing a Java application
ns).
What I could think of are two things:
1. upper/lowercasing problem
---
eg. when you told samba to ignore the case, but (maybe) Java doesn't
handle it correctly when using file.exists()
2. wrong path separators
---
What kind of path separators do you use (backslash vs. forwardslas
system.
In your case it appears that /usr/local/lib/libiconv_plug.so has been
compiled for a different arcitecture.
Try
% file /usr/local/lib/libiconv_plug.so
and
% uname -m
and tell us what you get.
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at
signature.asc
. (OpenLDAP does).
CUT-
you cannot simply use /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow for Samba. Samba needs
its own password store unless you use LDAP (ldapsam).
You should also read the extensive documentation (HOWTOs) on
www.samba.org, eg. you could start with
http://us3.samba.org/sam
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:47 +0100, gianfranco pra floriani wrote:
>
> Udo Rader wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 22:30 +0100, gianfranco pra floriani wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> I have Samba version 3.0.24 running on a 2.6.14-gentoo-r5 x86 kernel
> &
le the file transfer process seems not to be involved in this
> problem.
This is quite common with VPN connections. What response time do you get
from a ping (LAN vs. VPN)?
A major network performance for VPN clients is the correct configuration
of various networking parameters (such
rs I have yet to see something like
> this.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Steve Harper
> > > Center for High Performance Computing
> > > University of Utah.
> > >
> > > James Pulver wrote:
> > >> So, I'm trying to figur
nt side?)
TIA!
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Well, that would be my second question and now you already answered it.
Thank you, Tim and Andrew!
udo
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 12:52, Tim Tait wrote:
>> Udo wrote:
>>
>> >and I can see and edit the files of this users' home directory on th
words for the Samba
users, but it dons't (and now, as far as I understood, it couldn't even do
that). I now set the passwords and everything is ok.
Thank you very much, Thomas!
udo
Thomas Klettke wrote:
> Just to be sure: Did you set a password for the users on the Samba
> server?
. I do not use any password, neither is
Win98 configured to verify any passwords. I simply type in a username, no
password. It's that old simple network login window.
Well, now I open \\vovo\udo (the user I used to log in to the win98 machine)
and I can see and edit the files of this users
art samba, the printers appear again.
the printer side is handled by cups 1.1.20final+cvs20040330-1.
Any ideas?
happy hacking
Udo Rader
--
b e s t s o l u t i o n . a tEDV Systemhaus GmbH
--------
Hello,
I recently changed to samba 2.2.5 and now the ibm OS/2 linker (Version
03.06.PPK1981104) creates files with a length of more than 1 GB, while
the file length is about 200 KB under Samba 2.2.1a.
Does anyone know about this or has a solution?
Regards
Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this
22 matches
Mail list logo
