On 2011-10-26 09:58, Ian Coetzee wrote:
Hi guys,
I just came across an interesting question. Is there a way to do
realtime virus scanning on samba 3.4.7 on ubuntu 10.04.
I have found "scannedonly [1]" and "vscan [2]", but neither of them is
in the repositories meaning we will have to package th
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 17:27:00 Christian Brandes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Guilty of late evening blindness, guess it's better to take a long nap :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 17:27:00 Christian Brandes wrote:
> Hi all,
.
> 1) Either it picks a SERVER2-4 with ip aliases on its interfaces. Then the
> SERVER responds with a different ip number than the client sent its
> request to. So the client does not recognize the SAM Response "user
> u
Am Donnerstag, 4. März 2010 03:53:57 schrieb Jonathan Bennett:
> After hours of searching, I found a fix. Adding "posix locking = no" to
> that share in smb.conf fixed the problem. I'm not sure exactly what was
> happening, but everything seems to work with that clause in place.
>
Since the "ldb
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 23:49:32 schrieb Cain, Marc:
> We deliver Local GPOs by copying from client to server share then back to
> local System32 folder on logon, applying a "gpupdate /force" after the
> copy. This works pretty well with both WinXP and Windows 7 for any
> policies that are
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 01:14:33 schrieb Jonathon Doran:
> Quoting Roman Muñoz :
> > But XP and Ubuntu keep dropping each other out of domain. Any ideas?
>
> You might not be seeing this, but it is something to think about...
>
> I needed (or chose to) create separate machine accounts for eac
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 14:40:30 schrieb Roman Muñoz:
> Thanks for your answers.
>
> Probably it would be not very difficult to change the MAC address. This
> has the advantage that could work even if IT staff doesn't want to do
> any change in their dhcpd configuration.
>
> On the other hand
Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2010 20:20:15 schrieb Roman Muñoz:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting some Ubuntu Karmic clients on a school net. PDC is windows
> 2k3 r2. I realized that DHCP server sends only "school", not
> "school.net" as domain name. I have been told that AD configuration was
> migrated "as is" fro
Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2010 00:31:34 schrieb Peter Olcott:
> I spent several days (at least 20 hours) tying to get Fedora 11 Samba
> server going. I consulted every resource that I knew including this list.
> When I discovered that Fedora 11 Samba could be browsed immediately upon
> installation,
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 20:24:25 schrieb Jason Somers:
> Clients are NFP, and have about 100 workstations. Once or twice a year,
> they get grants for upwards of 10 new systems. These systems get
> distributed to those with the most need, and in turn, their systems get
> passed to whomever has
Am Sonntag, 16. August 2009 03:17:41 schrieb Wayne Stidolph:
> I need a pointer to what Fine Manual I should go read to set up my
> netbios name resolution, because all my attempts to use netbios names
> are being resolved against dns ...
>
> I have one subnet (192.168.2/24), with several Fedora 11
Am Sonntag, 16. August 2009 03:17:41 schrieb Wayne Stidolph:
> I need a pointer to what Fine Manual I should go read to set up my
> netbios name resolution, because all my attempts to use netbios names
> are being resolved against dns ...
>
> I have one subnet (192.168.2/24), with several Fedora 11
Am Freitag 05 Juni 2009 23:40:20 schrieb Matt Burkhardt:
> Okay - I've been plugging away and it got to the point that running
> smbclient was returning information about an Alfresco install that I
> never used, so I went ahead and deleted everything I could find on my
> machine that said "alfresco
Am Dienstag 26 Mai 2009 11:13:13 schrieb Dennis Duggen:
> Hi list
>
> I have trouble setting up the system permissions to be secure. Here my
> basic setup.
>
> 2 groups: users and staff
>
> /home/user should have the permissions user:users rwx--
> /mnt/staff should have the permissions user:sta
Am Monday 27 April 2009 06:55:57 schrieb yudi shiddiq:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a case that when 2 client open the same file from file server, the
> first client open it correctly, and the second client when open it there is
> not show warning that file in use.
>
Depends upon the OS of the client as w
Am Sunday 26 April 2009 20:35:12 schrieb Todd E Thomas:
> Hey all,
>
> Let me first start by saying everything is working as expected so far!
> This is about my login script being shared from the netlogon directory.
>
> My XP client sees and executes the 99% of the script. The last little
> bit is
Am Thursday 23 April 2009 08:33:44 schrieb el...@elekno.fi:
> Walter Mautner kirjoitti:
> > Am Tuesday 21 April 2009 13:30:28 schrieb Elias Knuutila:
..
> >> error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(95) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans)
> >> NT_STATUS_NOT_A_REPARSE_POINT
> >
>
Am Tuesday 21 April 2009 13:30:28 schrieb Elias Knuutila:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with Samba occasionally starting to fail with any write
> operations to a public share. When Samba is started clean, everything
> works OK. Then at some stage some users start to experience errors
> trying to wri
Am Tuesday 14 April 2009 23:42:58 schrieb MargoAndTodd:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a bit of PDC confusion on my part.
>
> 1) I do not give machine names a password. Am I
> correct?
>
Yes, the machine password is "machine-generated" at the time a machine is
joined to the domain.
> 2) I am presuming that
Am Wednesday 01 April 2009 17:06:01 schrieb Mike Woods:
> Firstly, hello! :)
>
> I've been trying to setup a share with permissions to allow users within
> the web group to be able to put files up, have full access to their own
> files but read only access to other users files, I've got what I thin
Am Wednesday 01 April 2009 02:04:47 schrieb Marcelo Opazo Vivallos:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have any guideline or variable in Samba in the configuration
> file it determines that a user can not logging at the same time, in
> order to avoid same login from different places at the same time.
>
> For now, wh
Am Thursday 26 March 2009 13:55:43 schrieb Tamás Pisch:
> Hi,
>
> as I wrote some weeks ago, I walk through on the SaMBa Guide/Making happy
> users. I struggled some days with roaming profiles. The client didn't find
> the default profile on the server (but it applied NTConfig.POL from that
> share
Am Saturday 21 February 2009 04:35:05 schrieb Ed Kasky:
> Well, somehow things have been corrected and no runaway processes for
> 5 days at least. I wish I could say for sure what was causing the
> problem but the one thing that changed just before it all stopped was
> that we powered off the one
Am Saturday 21 February 2009 05:51:39 schrieb yudi shiddiq:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm really need help, i'm using samba server as file server and using
> samba-3.2.6-1 on my file server.
>
> My pc client using win xp pro and win ME, the problem is when we work using
> open office 2 and want to sav
Am Monday 16 February 2009 21:00:04 schrieb Dragan Lukic:
> OK, I might not be a most polite person, but for sure I am not rude. Do
> have in mind that english is not my native language, and as I am not using
> it on day to day basis (spoken or written) my sentences might look/feel odd
> or as
Am Saturday 14 February 2009 01:15:54 schrieb Ed Kasky:
> At 10:52 AM Friday, 2/13/2009, Walter Mautner wrote -=>
> >how you make sure packets sent out through one interface don't get their
> >replies routed through the other.
>
> The only reason I have is one of
Am Friday 13 February 2009 14:01:43 schrieb Ed Kasky:
> Over the past 2 days, my smbd processes are multiplying worse than
> rabbits. At least with rabbits it's easy to tell why you wind up
> with so many...
>
> Here's the setup:
> Samba version 3.2.8-0.24 installed via rpm on a FC6 box with 2 nic
Am Tuesday 03 February 2009 14:43:43 schrieb BOURIAUD:
> On Friday 30 January 2009 19:22:49 Adam Williams wrote:
>
> Hello !
> Here is a late answer to your advices, which are very interesting.
>
> > Walter Mautner wrote:
> > > Bad. Storing mail databases on network d
Am Thursday 29 January 2009 17:02:09 schrieb BOURIAUD:
> Hi !
> I hope that someone will be abble to help me with the problem I get with my
> samba machines, though it is not really a samba problem.
> Here is the config I use :
> I'm running a samba controler on a rhel 5 machine (rpm -qa says
> sam
Am Monday 26 January 2009 20:30:36 schrieb Allen Chen:
> I use samba 3.0.22 on RHEL 4.
> Is there any VFS available to filter files belong to the login uid?
> The problem is that I have a shared folder on samba, but I don't know
> which file is mine. Too may people put too many files on the folder.
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
> Hi people! I have a few problems with the password strength in Samba.
> I have a PDC with LDAP on Debian Stable, with a few packages from
> backports. The problem is that I can't find a way to enforce strenght to
> the passwords of the users. I can't define a policy to fo
Helge Schichlein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Samba 3.0.13 running on Suse 9.2 on an i586.
>
> I can browse and connect to the Samba shares on the Linux machine from
> Windows XP and Mac OSX.
>
> However, about 1 min after connecting, the shares are lost and gone from
> the network environment - sam
Am Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 00:55 schrieb Terry Hardie:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running samba 3.0.22, and have reproduced this issue in 3.0.14a as
> well. I am trying to access a network share with a large number of long
> directory names (up to around 80 characters), with around 1100 of these
> directories
Am Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 02:19 schrieb Terry Hardie:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running samba 3.0.22, and have reproduced this issue in 3.0.14a as
> well. I am trying to access a network share with a large number of long
> directory names (up to around 80 characters), with around 1100 of these
> directories
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John Benedetto wrote:
> >
> > --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:46 PM +0100 Walter Mautner
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > >> [netlogon]
> > >>comment = Network Logon Service
> > >
> Hi!
> I need to make changes in crontab, but i have many servers to make
this changes.
> Is there some way to do this remotely at the same time for all
servers?
> (for example: replacing a file?)
man /etc/crontab?
begin 666 ATT00192.htm
M/"%$3T-465!%($A434P@4%5"3$E#("(M+R]7,T,O+T141"!(5$U,(#
> Dimitrios Stergiou wrote:
> What we are seeing is that they store their settings under
> the profile in a
> dir called "Local Settings" that does not move along with the profile.
>
> Thus when a user setup the client in one machine, then when
> he goes to another
> he has to re-configure outlook
> Last night at home, and on a second system today at work, I
> tried putting in the sample preexec statement contained in
> the smb.conf man page to check it's effect on the domain
> logons. Just like the preexec for the perl script it kills
> domain logons. As that script is right in the smb.conf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:samba-admin@;lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of steven henry
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Samba] How to configure server smb.conf and client
> Windows NT under auto DHCP obtain IP address?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:38:55AM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
..
> I did have a look at the docs really, but
> textdocs/UNIX-SMB.txt for instance says that "Unix has no
> simple way of implementing opportunistic locking, and
> currently Samba has no support for it."
>
> Which is out of date
> Subject: [Samba] 2.2.6 problems
>
...
> I have installed samba 2.2.6.
>
> And in my /var/log/messages i got:
>
> Oct 22 16:04:11 beer smbd[27622]: ERROR: string overflow by
> 1 in string_sub(%u, 7)
> Oct 22 16:04:11 beer smbd[27622]: [2002/10/22 16:04:11, 0]
> lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1217)
>
> Subject: [Samba] Utmp Problem
>
>
> I currently have a build of samba-2.2.5 running with cups and
> ldap support. I attempted to reconfigure, i.e. run configure
> enabling cups, ldap and now utmp. After samba configured I
> ran make and it made the new binaries. I added utmp = yes to
> my smb.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:samba-admin@;lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Files Missing on smbfs on RH 7.3
>
>
> So nobody has a clue as to what might be
## Please don't send HTML next time, it's impossible to quote ##
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin@;lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Fábio
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 9:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Wins. Urgente !!!
hi,
I´ve already configure my
[Please don't use HTML here if possible. I have to insert
quote signs by hand now]
Walter Mautner wrote:
> Subject: [Samba] Problem with Samba on Solaris 2.6
>> Have you configured smb.conf correctly that last Friday?
> I am assuming Samba is configured correctly. The con
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Samba] Roaming Profiles with win 98 - Doesn't work.
>
>
> I would like to know if anybody on this list has managed to
> have a network of 98 clients running off a samba server, and
> had roaming profiles, i.e. people's settings follow th
> Subject: [Samba] DNS error connecting to Domain
> Hello,
>
> I have a Windows 2000 Pro SP3 Laptop, and a RH 7.3 server
> running Samba 2.2.5.
>
> One day it refused to connect to the domain, said it wasn't
> available, couldn't access \\server01\user\profile directory,
> and refused to browse th
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin@;lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Vikas Gandhi
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2002 17:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [Samba] smbmount
Hi All
Is smbmount available for Sun Solaris. If not the what equivalent is
avai
48 matches
Mail list logo
