I can only tell you that it has nothing to do with Samba.
Google the error message...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have just downloaded and tested with the Samba3.0 Alpha21 Release. I want
to try to create the server account in the active directory, however,
when I
Dariush Forouher wrote:
Hello,
does 3.0 still need unix accounts for machine trust accounts? This would
be nice, because AFAIR in LDAP they can be placed into another
directory. If no, must there be some magic options present in smb.conf?
Another question: Is it possible to give samba
Chris Mason wrote:
My office network has a RH 7.3 server running Bind 9, Samba, WINS for
NetBIOS name resolution, ten+ Win2K workstations, and uses DHCP from the
Linksys router to hand out IPs for the workstations.
Is there any way to do dynamic DNS updates so that the workstations' IPs
In your printer share, define the following:
print command = echo %u@%I: %J %S %T /var/spool/samba/junkJ;\
a=`echo '%J' | sed s/^.*- //` ;\
/usr/bin/lpr -P%S -J$a %s;\
rm %s
It should log user@IP_of_the_user's_station among other usefuls
If you post to the group, rather to Samba developers directly, could you
please
describe the problem ? I don't think anybody is interested in postings
that don't have problem description. What's the point ?
William Jojo wrote:
I posted a rather lengthy message a few weeks ago.
Andrew B and
Not much help here, but it does work perfectly with LDAP backend (via
pwdMustChange attribute).
Sauro Saltini wrote:
Hi, everybody.
I've read many posts about forcing users to change their passwords at
logon time from windows clients, but still I can't make it work.
I've set up a
chown -R group /path/to/the/share
chmod -R g+w /path/to/the/share group
find /path/to/the/share -type d -exec chmod g+s {} \;
In smb.conf you will need only 2 options:
create mode = 0664
directory mode = 0775
But all those 60+ developers should be in that group if they
.
- Original Message -
From: Yura Pismerov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: info [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Force User -
You will need ACL support.
info wrote:
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users
Ivan Martynov wrote:
Hello,all.
I have Microsoft DOS client that only supports NetBIOS protocol
Can SAMBA route NetBIOS protocol and how can I do it?
If you mean NetBEUI, it is not routable protocol.
You may want to consider switching to NetBIOS over TCP/IP for your DOS
clients.
You will need ACL support.
info wrote:
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users to publish files from their
Windows XP PC's to my Apache Web Server on Red Hat Linux.
The username I use for Apache is apache and it has full read,write and
execute access on all the
can be configured. Then you use add user
script=/path/smbldap-useradd.pl -w %m$
I have many more questions but don't want to change the topic too much...
:)
Jonathan Higgins
Network Service Specialist IV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yura Pismerov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/31/02 07
CIFSbench ?
MAAHS, DAN wrote:
--- Received from WPS.DMAAHS 221-506311-01-02 158p
I would like to stress test my SAMBA installs. I currently have several
running on IA32 Linux using a recent distro of RedHat and several running
in virtual machines on an
Here what you could use:
LDAP with Kerberos password backend.
Samba 2.2.6 PDC with LDAP backend.
Windows passwords are stored in LDAP in samba object, not in Kerberos
KDC since they use incompatible encryption methods.
Use Kerberos passwords as primary source and synchronize Windows
passwords
jef dodson wrote:
I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the
following configuration:
[documents]
comment = documents
path = /shares/documents
public = no
writeable = yes
printable = no
valid users = lan1
force user = docadmin
Yura Pismerov wrote:
jef dodson wrote:
I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the
following configuration:
[documents]
comment = documents
path = /shares/documents
public = no
writeable = yes
printable = no
valid users = lan1
Pismerov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yura Pismerov wrote:
jef dodson wrote:
I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the
following configuration:
[documents]
comment = documents
path = /shares/documents
public
I hate this. And I guess I'm not alone...
Original Message
Subject: NDN: Re: [Samba] Samba PDC+LDAP: Account restrictions
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:34:13 +0100
From: Mailer-Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry. Your message could not
It has very little corelation with the original question that implied
getting rid of Windows PDC. What you offer is keeping Windows PDC as
primary source for all the accounts, and that is kind of an opposite
thing of what the original poster meant.
Christopher Barry wrote:
On Fri,
www.google.com - smbldap
That is what I've been using and I'm happy with it.
Ray Raszka wrote:
When using LDAP as both the Linux (nsswitch) and samba authentication
backend, is it necessary to add the Linux PosixAccount into the directory
before Adding the samba SambaAccount
Does not look like it is usable.
I could not get it to authenticate...
And what is the point of showing printers ?
The word Disk in the links is not needed either.
atom wrote:
Just would like to draw the maintainers attention to my GUI to samba.
Some time ago
I've noticed the list has pretty low answer:question ratio.
I tend to think that many replies go directly to people who post the
questions and those people never bother to share the answers with the
community. I don't think this is fair so we may want to do something in
this regard. We
Eric wrote:
On 10/18 10:24, Yura Pismerov wrote:
should consider setting up reply-to-list option.
I'd like to know what people think about it...
When I hit reply it goes to Yura. There should be a reply-to-list
but I'm not sure how to set that up in mailing lists.
So probably (my
I don't know if this is relevant, but try writeable=no and
browseable=no.
Paulo Fonseca Junior wrote:
Hi folks,
I have installed samba 2.2.6 on FreeBSD 4.7 with sharing above:
[printers]
comment = All printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
printable = yes
Correct me if I'm wrong. With Samba 2.2.5, there is no way to get a
group of users to manage printers so they be able to select/deselect
duplex mode, tray, etc.
Although I'm able to add a group with the Security tab and give them
appropriate permissions, it doe not work from the user side - all
Check valid users on the [print$] share.
Amaury DAILLIEZ wrote:
Hey all,
i've got a problem setting Samba as PDC + Printing,
The shared printers work perfectly while i'm not logged into the
domain...
- i can install printers under windows
- i can print to installed
logon script that will touch something in the user home ?
Schoep, Grant STORM wrote:
All,
On our main file server, all our home directorys are automount
points. So /home isn't a real filesystem area, it points to a bunch of
different home areas based on the auto.direct table.
My understanding is that domain admin group is deprecated option.
Have you tried using admin users = @ADMIN instead ?
Michael Nenishkis - List ID wrote:
Sorry, still stuck with this problem.
It is a repost, please kindly shed me light.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Dariush Forouher wrote:
Would this be also possible with only one NIC?
Of course.
--
Yuri Pismerov, Sr. System Administrator,
TUCOWS.COM INC. (416) 535-0123 ext. 1352
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
:
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 06:53, Donal Byrne wrote:
Thanks Yura, bust any reason why ext3 would be better?
-Original Message-
From: Yura Pismerov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 October 2002 22:53
To: Donal Byrne
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [Samba] Filesystem
ext3 is probably the best choice.
Donal Byrne wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this is a stupid question (bit of a newbie). I'm building a Samba
fileserver on a box with a hardware raid array of about 65GB which I'm
hoping to share out to the local LAN . I was wondering if the
Jean-Rene Cormier wrote:
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work? I've
compiled the packages, then installed them from the RPM but I had no
luck at all. I compiled a kernel with ACL support but when I try to set
a new permission it says permission not supported or
la part de Yura Pismerov
Envoyé : 1 octobre, 2002 10:32
À : Jean-Rene Cormier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Samba] ACL support
Jean-Rene Cormier wrote:
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work?
I've
compiled the packages, then installed them from the RPM
I solved the problem.
Apparently Linux quotacheck creates new format of quota files.
quotacheck -F vfsold did the trick.
Yura Pismerov wrote:
Hi all,
I've compiled samba --with-quotas, turned on user and group quotas on
ext3,
assigned
Andy wrote:
What is the best way to backup my NT 4.0 Server box
that is only 8GB to my NEW SAMBA file server that
I have added to the domain?
man smbtar
SMBTAR(1) SMBTAR(1)
NAME
smbtar - shell script for backing up
Look for LanManager. IIRC it should be on one of Windows NT CDs.
Alex wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for the first time at setting up Linux with Samba as a primary
server on our network. I would like to replace my SCO Unix system and a
Windows box I use to serve MSDOS machines. The
I think smb2www is outdated software.
Not to mention bugs (looping and 100% CPU consumption).
I'd not recommend to use it...
Thiruvarasu wrote:
have anyone used the samba to web gateway (smb2www) ? Can someone walk me through
with getting the system up ? I think i
Glasswalker wrote:
Hello everybody,
I´m trying to figure out how to trackdown users
login/logout at my Samba PDC.
I was thinking to use the preexec and postexec
functions at a sharing, but this seems to be ugly: if
a user disconnects the sharing, I lose the logout
information.
Stephan Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi,
how can i add more than one wins server in the smb.conf file? wins server =
server1, server2 does not work. also wins server = server1 server 2 not work.
only one entry works :(
man smb.conf
Samba does not support (yet) multiple WINS
I think you should wait for 3.0 release.
Dominic Deferia wrote:
hi,
Does the domain group map, domain user map and local group map work in samba
2.2.5 version. when i added this option in smb.conf global and did a
testparm i get an error of
Load smb config files from
Any firewall rules on it ?
Brian Beaver wrote:
I'm having a problem with a samba 2.0.10-0.7 server on Redhat 7.0 (kernel
2.2.17-8).. The error message when running smbclient is:
added interface ip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx bcast xxx.xxx.xxx.191
nmask=255.255.255.192
40 matches
Mail list logo
