hi all
i have two samba servers version v2 and v3, both participating in a 2000 AD
Domain
if i upgrade the 2000 domain to 2003 (currently setup in mixed mode) will *
both* samba servers still function as domain members ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
it's a new server so can't be the issue...
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ip guy wrote:
hi all
my samba installation 3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4, installed via yum on a CentOS5
sever seems to ignore the server string...
no matter what i supply
hi all
my samba installation 3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4, installed via yum on a CentOS5
sever seems to ignore the server string...
no matter what i supply the string variable, the drive is mapped to the
win32 clients and echo's the samba version.
anyone having the same issue ?
--
To unsubscribe from
Hi all
I'm in the process of migrating our Samba 2.x domain member server of a
windows 2000 domain to a samba 3.x domain member server of a windows 2003
domain.
i have a few questions
1) after i upgrade the 2000 domain server to 2003, will the samba 2.x server
still be able to function as a
Hi all
I'm in the process of migrating our Samba 2.x domain member server of a
windows 2000 domain to a samba 3.x domain member server of a windows 2003
domain.
i have a few questions
1) after i upgrade the 2000 domain server to 2003, will the samba 2.x server
still be able to function as a
Hi all
I'm in the process of migrating our Samba 2.x domain member server of a
windows 2000 domain to a samba 3.x domain member server of a windows 2003
domain.
i have a few questions
1) after i upgrade the 2000 domain server to 2003, will the samba 2.x server
still be able to function as a
hi all
i'm about to upgrade from samba 2.x to a samba 3.x domain member server and
wanted to fact ACL support into the equation.
what is the recommended ACL file system for samba ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
