Hi!
Does anyone know how to move/migrate ACLs from file_ntacls.tdb to another
machine?
I tried manually copy file_ntacls.tdb and restart samba but it doesn't work.
Also I tried to dump and restore tdb file using tdbdump and tdbrestore without
success.
Can anyone help?
Cheers!
Adrian Berlin
--
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:12:35PM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
> Hi!
> Does anyone know how to move/migrate ACLs from file_ntacls.tdb to another
> machine?
> I tried manually copy file_ntacls.tdb and restart samba but it doesn't work.
> Also I tried to dump and restore tdb file using tdbdump and t
Many thanks for response.
Do you recommend any good tool to backup ACLs?
I have another question about how many ACLs can be stored in acl_xattr and
acl_tdb for one directory/file?
Cheers!
Adrian Berlin
Dnia 14 listopada 2011 20:17 Jeremy Allison napisaĆ(a):
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:12:35P
I suppose this number is subject to both file system and Samba vfs object,
whichever comes first to its limit.
-David
2011/11/15 adrian.berlin
> Many thanks for response.
> Do you recommend any good tool to backup ACLs?
>
> I have another question about how many ACLs can be stored in acl_xattr
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:12:35PM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know how to move/migrate ACLs from file_ntacls.tdb to another
machine?
I tried manually copy file_ntacls.tdb and restart samba but it doesn't work.
Also I tried to dump and restore tdb file usin
Hi!
Many thanks for help.
Regarding to how many ACLs can be stored in acl_tdb and acl_xattr, I can save
on XFS only 22 entries plus CREATOR GROUP, CREATOR OWNER and EVERYONE. Seems it
is about 25 entries for one directory/file.
Is it correct or I missed something?
Cheers!
/Adrian Berlin
Dnia
On 11/15/11 11:36 PM, "adrian.berlin" wrote:
> Hi!
Many thanks for help.
Regarding to how many ACLs can be stored in acl_tdb
> and acl_xattr, I can save on XFS only 22 entries plus CREATOR GROUP, CREATOR
> OWNER and EVERYONE. Seems it is about 25 entries for one directory/file.
Is it
> correct or
Gary Greene wrote:
[SNIP]
> Actually, that is true IIRC for all Linux ACL enabled file-systems
> (they all use the same VFS code for ACL and EA manipulation.)
That would be incorrect.
The one that I am intimately familiar with IBM's GPFS uses it's own
special VFS layer. Given that GPFS holds