On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:20:06 Ronan Waide wrote:
>On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> PS: On a different note: Ron, do you have a constructive comment on
..
>I'm just tracking the list for info on 'net rpc vampire' at present,
>so that makes me a ki
>On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact
>> that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be
>> ashamed of but rather reason to be proud.
>
>I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this
>opin
On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact
> that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be
> ashamed of but rather reason to be proud.
I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this
opinion, es
ttrib', Tue Nov 26 20:53:28 2002, and compose
a terse flame bait?
Dragan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dragan Krnic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 23:21
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Samba] "attrib +R
;attrib +R myowndir" fails to write-protect my own
dir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:33:11PM +0100, Dragan Krnic wrote:
>> I'm so glad there are kind souls at this time of night. Wait, it
>> might be day at your place. Good day!
>
> Yep, it&#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:33:11PM +0100, Dragan Krnic wrote:
I'm so glad there are kind souls at this time of night. Wait, it might
be day at your place. Good day!
Yep, it's 1:30 in the afternoon here in California :-).
I don't see a contradiction in setting Readonly
--
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:48:21
jra wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:33:11PM +0100, Dragan Krnic wrote:
>> I'm so glad there are kind souls at this time of night. Wait, it might
>> be day at your place. Good day!
>
>Yep, it's 1:30 in the afternoon here in California :-).
>
>> I don't see a
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:10:19 jra wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:06:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> True, but was his desire to prevent deletion of the directory, like in
>> DOS?
>>
>> C:\>mkdir test
>> C:\>attrib +r test
>> C:\>rmdir test
>> Access is denied.
>> C:\>attrib -r test
>> C
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:33:11PM +0100, Dragan Krnic wrote:
> I'm so glad there are kind souls at this time of night. Wait, it might
> be day at your place. Good day!
Yep, it's 1:30 in the afternoon here in California :-).
> I don't see a contradiction in setting Readonly flag on one's own
> di
I'm so glad there are kind souls at this time of night. Wait, it might
be day at your place. Good day!
I don't see a contradiction in setting Readonly flag on one's own
directories and then creating files in them anyways. It's very much
like any overruling root privilege. It's just a flag, Jeremy
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:06:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True, but was his desire to prevent deletion of the directory, like in
> DOS?
>
> C:\>mkdir test
> C:\>attrib +r test
> C:\>rmdir test
> Access is denied.
> C:\>attrib -r test
> C:\>rmdir test
>
> This works on windows mapped sh
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:23:30PM +0100, Dragan Krnic wrote:
> A trivial case:
>
> executing the following DOS command from the prompt line on a Win2K SP3:
>
>%windir%\system32\attrib.exe +R H:\dir
>
> can't set the R(eadonly) flag on my home dirs (2.2.7):
>
>drwxrwsr-x 4 me users
A trivial case:
executing the following DOS command from the prompt line on a Win2K SP3:
%windir%\system32\attrib.exe +R H:\dir
can't set the R(eadonly) flag on my home dirs (2.2.7):
drwxrwsr-x 4 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:59 .
drwxr-sr-x 2 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:59 dir
-r--r-
13 matches
Mail list logo
