ED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] [OT] Fyodor terminates SCO nmap rights -- how about
Samba?
> >> Actually, didn't SCO make the arguement that any GPL'd software should
> >> actually be declared "public domain"? If that's so
Actually, didn't SCO make the arguement that any GPL'd software should
actually be declared "public domain"? If that's so, doesn't allowing them
to continue using the software under the GPL put the copyright at risk?
In their site they write (these are not THEIR words !):
"Congress shall have Po
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Jim Shanks wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:51 -0500
> > Rashkae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My question is this: by declaring the GPL as invalid, isn't that
> > non-acceptance of the license, which in turn invalidates your right to
> > distribute all GPL software? (SCO
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:51 -0500
> Rashkae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As much as I would like to see a slew of copyright infringement claims
>> get filed against SCO, from my reading of the GPL, violations of the
>> license only terminate
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:51 -0500
> Rashkae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As much as I would like to see a slew of copyright infringement claims
>> get filed against SCO, from my reading of the GPL, violations of the
>> license only terminate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:51 -0500
Rashkae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As much as I would like to see a slew of copyright infringement claims
> get filed against SCO, from my reading of the GPL, violations of the
> license only terminates your right
8 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] [OT] Fyodor terminates SCO nmap rights -- how about
Samba?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you all may know Fyodor of nmap fame has terminated SCO's
rights to distribute namp with its products. See:
http://www.smh.com.au
Michael Brown wrote:
As you all may know Fyodor of nmap fame has terminated SCO's
rights to distribute namp with its products. See:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/27/1077676955381.html
"Fyodor, whose Nmap (network mapper) security scanner is extremely popular among geeks and
even featured
As much as I would like to see a slew of copyright infringement claims
get filed against SCO, from my reading of the GPL, violations of the
license only terminates your right to distribute the software which
was violated. AFAIK, the only GPL software who's license SCO has
arguably violated, to dat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you all may know Fyodor of nmap fame has terminated SCO's
rights to distribute namp with its products. See:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/27/1077676955381.html
I know this is off-topic, but I am interested in opinions
on the subject of S
10 matches
Mail list logo
