Re: [Samba] ADS on Solaris

2006-05-11 Thread Tim Evans
> ADS support is non-trivial. There are so many additional packages and > libraries needed. You would have to provide distributions of > kerberos, SSL, ldap, iconv, sasl, readline, etc. There was a lengthy article in SysAdmin Magazine sometime within the past 18 months. December, 04 maybe? It

Re: [Samba] ADS on Solaris

2006-05-11 Thread Eric Boehm
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:54:00AM -0700, Harris, Jason (DIS) wrote: > "Jason" == Harris, Jason \(DIS\) writes: Jason> Hi all, I see that the premade binaries for Samba on Jason> Solaris, even recent versions, have ADS support not Jason> compiled in. I see more ad domains than nt

[Samba] ADS on Solaris

2006-05-11 Thread Harris, Jason \(DIS\)
Hi all, I see that the premade binaries for Samba on Solaris, even recent versions, have ADS support not compiled in. I see more ad domains than nt4 domains these days, so I am going to compile it myself with ads on. I want to ask the experienced if there are any gotchas with ads Samba on Solar