-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2007 03:39 PM, ryan punt escreveu:
Is priv assignment limited to accounts whose sambaPrimaryGroupSID
has RID 512, or is simply having the account name listed as a
member in the group definition enough?
I think the second one is
I just got Samba + LDAP up and running as a PDC. If I list the users in
the LDAP directory with pdbedit -L I see:
root:0:test
nobody:99:nobody
aster$:1001:Computer
toast$:1002:TOAST$
fordprefect:1003:Test Account
Shouldn't there be an Administrator account and no root?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2007 12:36 PM, ryan punt escreveu:
I just got Samba + LDAP up and running as a PDC. If I list the users in
the LDAP directory with pdbedit -L I see:
root:0:test
nobody:99:nobody
aster$:1001:Computer
toast$:1002:TOAST$
After Samba 3.0.14 you can have a normal user account with
Domain Administrator powers, which includes adding machines to the
domain and other privileges, using 'net groupmap'.
So you can an account as the LDAP administrator, another
account as your Samba Administrator and your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2007 06:29 PM, Jason Baker escreveu:
I just got Samba + LDAP up and running as a PDC. If I list the users in
the LDAP directory with pdbedit -L I see:
root:0:test
nobody:99:nobody
aster$:1001:Computer
toast$:1002:TOAST$
I just got Samba + LDAP up and running as a PDC. If I list the users in
the LDAP directory with pdbedit -L I see:
root:0:test
nobody:99:nobody
aster$:1001:Computer
toast$:1002:TOAST$
fordprefect:1003:Test Account
Shouldn't there be an Administrator account and no root? I don't
Does use root in ldap without a shell help you?
On 1/16/07, Jason Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got Samba + LDAP up and running as a PDC. If I list the users in
the LDAP directory with pdbedit -L I see:
root:0:test
nobody:99:nobody
aster$:1001:Computer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve A wrote:
The Samba-3 by Example instructs you to make a mapping,
root = Administrator. Is this absolutely necessary?
No. Not necessary. Read up on Samba's privilege model.
cheers, jerry
The Samba-3 by Example instructs you to make a mapping, root =
Administrator. Is this absolutely necessary? What if someone hacks a
Windows machine and is able to supply Administrator credentials to Samba?
Is there a way around this? I can live with having to supply root
credentials in
Is it possible to have samba adminitrator account with non zero uid?
I have a problem with email if admin is root. creating alias in postifx is somehow not
a good option in my case.
Tks.
--beast
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 20:10, Beast wrote:
Is it possible to have samba adminitrator account with non zero uid?
No. Not if you want to administer smbpasswd or ldap accounts.
We are working to reduce this restriction, but for now that's the way it
is.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
11 matches
Mail list logo