Re[2]: [Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:31:57 -0500 Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GC Jean-Jacques Moulis wrote: GC By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! GC GC We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. GC GC

Re: [Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Jacques Moulis wrote: GC Since upgrading to 3.0.25 and regressing to GC 3.0.24-gc-1 some users couldn't GC print (strange considering map to guest = Bad Password) GC GC they got an NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL in log files and were refused

[Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. with the following configuration security = DOMAIN password server = PDC encrypt passwords = yes map

Re: [Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Jacques Moulis wrote: By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. with the following configuration security