Re: [Samba] Big performance difference between smbclient put/get

2006-04-13 Thread James Peach
On 4/13/06, Henrik Zagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm using Samba 3.0.21 on a FC4 box. > > When copying files using smbclient I get huge speed differences > between put and get commands. > > smb: \> put backup.tar > putting file backup.tar as \backup.tar (543.0 kb/s) (average 5

Re: [Samba] Big performance difference between smbclient put/get

2006-04-13 Thread Henrik Zagerholm
I'll take a look at them and see if I can tweak them a bit. Using mount.cifs I don't get this big difference so it has something to do with the smbclient. The degraded performance is also only apparent when I copy from a Linux box running samba to a win client. While copying to another Linu

Re: [Samba] Big performance difference between smbclient put/get

2006-04-13 Thread andy liebman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I'm using Samba 3.0.21 on a FC4 box. When copying files using smbclient I get huge speed differences between put and get commands. smb: \> put backup.tar putting file backup.tar as \backup.tar (543.0 kb/s) (average 543.0 kb/s) smb: \> get backup.tar getting

[Samba] Big performance difference between smbclient put/get

2006-04-13 Thread Henrik Zagerholm
Hi list, I'm using Samba 3.0.21 on a FC4 box. When copying files using smbclient I get huge speed differences between put and get commands. smb: \> put backup.tar putting file backup.tar as \backup.tar (543.0 kb/s) (average 543.0 kb/s) smb: \> get backup.tar getting file \backup.tar of size