Thanks Jeremy, Andrew, Jerry for all the information.
-Aravind
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 05:17:21PM +0530, Aravinda Guzzar wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> thank you very much for the information.
>
> Is there any plans to backport smb 2.0 to the 3.0. releases of samba in
> future?
Probably.
> What will be the repercussion of using Vista client which has smb
> 2.0pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aravinda Guzzar wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> thank you very much for the information.
>
> Is there any plans to backport smb 2.0 to the 3.0. releases
> of samba in future?
To clarify, Samba'4s SMB2 implementation is incomplete. We will
implement SMB2
Hi Andrew,
thank you very much for the information.
Is there any plans to backport smb 2.0 to the 3.0. releases of samba in
future?
What will be the repercussion of using Vista client which has smb
2.0protocol support aganist non Smb
2.0 server? Currently it Negotiates with the earlier version
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:55 +0530, Aravinda Guzzar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a specific question about the SMB 2 (or CIFS 2 version protocol).
>
> SMB2 was introduced with Microsoft Vista and is a redesign of the older SMB
> protocol. (http://wiki.ethereal.com/SMB2)
>
> Is current samba 3.0.xx rel
Hi,
I have a specific question about the SMB 2 (or CIFS 2 version protocol).
SMB2 was introduced with Microsoft Vista and is a redesign of the older SMB
protocol. (http://wiki.ethereal.com/SMB2)
Is current samba 3.0.xx release (or samba 4 release) support this protocol
when vista client tries t
