Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-10 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:24:01PM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: You are right if I work with the share sometimes the read only access returns. See my attached log in the zip-file What file did you want to open r/w and could not in this log file? With best regards, Volker Lendecke -- SerNet

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Müller
--- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011 16:17 An: Daniel Müller Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:51

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:31:55AM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: So I do not give up as other users may have the same problems: I did a file test.xlsx and it seems samba does a posix lock read only?!!Why? Have you taken a look at the smb.conf posix locking option? The posix read lock is not

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Müller
Müller Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:31:55AM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: So I do not give up as other users may have the same problems: I did a file test.xlsx and it seems samba does a posix lock read

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Müller
--- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011 09:52 An: Daniel Müller Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:31:55AM +0100, Daniel

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:41:24AM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: Posix locking is yes so I will point it to no!? If you want to avoid the posix lock calls, yes. I am not certain however that this will be the final fix for the problem. I have not seen the full logfiles yet, you only have small

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Müller
: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:31:55AM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: So I do not give up as other users may have the same problems: I did a file test.xlsx and it seems samba does a posix lock read only?!!Why? Have you taken a look

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Daniel Müller
Nachricht- Von: Harry Jede [mailto:walk2...@arcor.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011 11:32 An: muel...@tropenklinik.de Betreff: Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files On 11:24:47 wrote Daniel Müller: Dear all, I have set up a two node workin gluster

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread John Drescher
I did with a simpler share, but it is the same bahaviour. Telling me: another user open read only. I think Fuse/Glusterfs cannot manage msoffice files written from msword or msexcell. Remember that office files are not normal. When you save in office the application creates a

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Daniel Müller
An: muel...@tropenklinik.de Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files I did with a simpler share, but it is the same bahaviour. Telling me: another user open read only. I think Fuse/Glusterfs cannot manage msoffice files written from

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:12:00PM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: But even with the force group or force create mode it is still not possible to do it on a glusterd vol. I think I will skip glusterd and return to gfs2 and drbd. Without further analysis I don't think this is appropriate. Volker

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Daniel Müller
: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011 15:16 An: Daniel Müller Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:51:26PM +0100, Daniel Müller wrote: So I created the file versuch.docx on the glusterd-vol. At the end of my smbd.log the file is read only. Only one change in the file possible If that is all the logs that you can ever get out of your Server (your max log size must

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Aaron E.
Is this possibly a caching issue? I had some problems with nfs file share that sounded somewhat like this and it turned out to be caching. I disabled caching on the mount and it all worked perfectly. On 02/08/2011 10:16 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:51:26PM +0100,

Re: [Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-08 Thread Harry Jede
On 18:33:52 wrote Daniel Müller: So I created the file versuch.docx on the glusterd-vol. At the end of my smbd.log the file is read only. Only one change in the file possible My share definition: [test] path=/mnt/glusterfs/windows/test readonly=no profile acls =

[Samba] CentOs 5.5 Glusterfs 3.1.0 Samba 3.5 MSOffice Files

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Müller
Dear all, I have set up a two node workin gluster with glusterfs3.1 and Samba-Sernet 3.5. Everything is working great except MSOffice files (Word/Excell). On the gluster-vol they have the strange behavior That they rest read only, write protected. Every other type of files can be manged without