RE: [Samba] Heimdal or MIT kerberos comparison

2006-12-27 Thread James A. Dinkel
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 4:38 PM > > It's a Samba4 thing, because we bundle kerberos in the distribution. > > > > Almost all users will use the system kerberos libraries, whatever they > are. They tend to

RE: [Samba] Heimdal or MIT kerberos comparison

2006-12-26 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 16:28 -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrew Bartlett > > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:42 PM > > > > The biggest thing users will notice is that the error message system > > returns contextual errors, with the actual reason for th

RE: [Samba] Heimdal or MIT kerberos comparison

2006-12-26 Thread James A. Dinkel
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Bartlett > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:42 PM > > The biggest thing users will notice is that the error message system > returns contextual errors, with the actual reason for the failure, not > just the translated code. It often includes the vita

Re: [Samba] Heimdal or MIT kerberos comparison

2006-12-23 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 10:23 -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: > What is the difference between Heimdal and MIT as far usability goes? > MIT seems to be the default on major linux distrobutions, but I here a > lot about people preferring Heimdal, but I can't find any reasons why. > Is one generally more

[Samba] Heimdal or MIT kerberos comparison

2006-12-22 Thread James A. Dinkel
What is the difference between Heimdal and MIT as far usability goes? MIT seems to be the default on major linux distrobutions, but I here a lot about people preferring Heimdal, but I can't find any reasons why. Is one generally more stable/faster/reliable than the other? There is already a bla