Am Monday 27 April 2009 06:55:57 schrieb yudi shiddiq:
Hey all,
I have a case that when 2 client open the same file from file server, the
first client open it correctly, and the second client when open it there is
not show warning that file in use.
Depends upon the OS of the client as well
These settings are (S) in man smb.conf which means you should set them under
the share stanza, not in the global section.
That is incorrect.
Share parameters can also be used in the [global] section to be applied
globally.
Global parameters can only be used in the [global] section.
Hey all,
I have a case that when 2 client open the same file from file server, the first
client open it correctly, and the second client when open it there is not show
warning that file in use.
Is there any way to set when the second client or next client open the file,
the file should be
Hello all,
I need help about smbiod, i have mounted samba server
from linux client with command mount -t smbfs -o username=root
//10.10.x.x/folder /dest and then the client ask about password, and
it works, but when i copy files in the middle of the process suddenly
it stoped, then i run command
james Flores wrote:
Hello all,
I need help about smbiod, i have mounted samba server
from linux client with command mount -t smbfs -o username=root
//10.10.x.x/folder /dest and then the client ask about password, and
it works, but when i copy files in the middle of the process suddenly
it
Hello everybody...
I need help about logon script, this time i want to change time format from 12
format to 24 format on pc client.
I'm using samba 3.0.20 on PDC and the client is mostly win xp but we have pc
with os win ME too.
I change from logon.exe that i put on every user directory which
I change from logon.exe that i put on every user directory which has script
like
this
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\International]
iTime=1
sTimeFormat=HH:mm:ss
But when i try to login the time format doesn't change it still in 12 format,
i've tried many times
have you put that regedit4 data into a file and ran it with regedit /s
time.reg in their login script?
yudi shiddiq wrote:
Hello everybody...
I need help about logon script, this time i want to change time format from 12
format to 24 format on pc client.
I'm using samba 3.0.20 on PDC and the
Adam Williams wrote:
have you put that regedit4 data into a file and ran it with regedit /s
time.reg in their login script?
yudi shiddiq wrote:
Hello everybody...
I need help about logon script, this time i want to change time
format from 12 format to 24 format on pc client.
I'm using
I have an isolated LAN with an out-of-box installation of RHEL 5.0 Server
64-bit running samba, with some CentOS 5.0 systems and Windows XP w/SP2
machines. The XP machines are part of a domain via the RHEL Samba setup.
I want to be able to control such things as the XP Event Viewer loggings
Hey, I don't know if this is the right list to ask this question in, but I have
tried on the IRC (irc.freenode.net #samba) and people on there advised me to
try here instead.
I have:
Debian 4.0r4
Samba version 3.0.24 - mail.birke-gym.dk - 10.3.16.1
krb5 Version 1.4.4-7etch6
Kernel Version
I have a no-frill samba server that users can access their home
directories from. Now,
I'd like to set up a share that contains a file that only I can write
to, but anyone can read it.
I only seem to be able to do one or the other. If I can write to it,
no one can read it. If everyone
can
What happens if you have:
[test]
path = /export/share/test/file.txt
read only = no
guest ok = yes
write list = me
valid users = everyone here that should have any sort of access
? That seems like it should work.
On Nov 25, 2008, at 4:35 PM, myron wrote:
I have a no-frill samba server that users
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Mike Gallamore wrote:
For a space with a similar purpose we have:
[software]
path=/samfs32/share/projects32/software
browsable = yes
guest ok = yes
writeable = yes
write list = nickus kressin matt
In theory writeable = yes should
I have done a version upgrade and now have Ubuntu 8.10 AMD 64 with Samba
3.2.4
I'm still having the same problem.
I'm now virtually positive its my configuration
Anyone out there got any ideas?
Robert Steinmetz wrote:
I've posted about this problem several times but so far nothing has
Mike wrote:
Rob,
I'm very new to establishing domains with samba, having run standalone
servers for several years.
Your post caught my attention relating to a slightly different domain
problem I've encountered.
Anyway, while skimming some TOSHARG sections I thought you should
include the
Hello All,
I'ma developer from Brazil and I'm studying samba sources. Now I'm trying
to build a sample application with samba 4 sources. It's quite simple, I
just
want to pick the time from a given remote windows machine, and then schedule
a job 2 minutes after that using atsvc. I think I'm
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 10:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I'ma developer from Brazil and I'm studying samba sources.
I would suggest re-posting your question to samba-technical - your
question would be quite on topic there, particularly regarding Samba4.
Now I'm trying
to
Hi all,
I hope someone might be able to offer me some advice. I have a NAS
box, a QNAP TS-109 which runs a version of Debian Linux. It has a
local ext3 drive, and I also smbmount a network drive on it (a Lacie
ED mini which I have tried formatted as both ext3 and FAT32 without
solving my
Hello all,
I've run into an issue while migrating a client's Samba PDC from Debian
3.x to OpenSuSE 10.3, have been beating my head against it for over a
week, and am now turning to the mailing list for help.
We're running Samba 3.0.26a-3-1478-SUSE-SL10.3 authenticating against
OpenLDAP 2.3.37.
Well i did my smb.conf as simple as you showned.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Processing section [share]
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
[global]
workgroup = ACME
From Windows the error is: share is not accessible. You might not have
permission to use this network resource. The network path was not found.
--
Have you tried from windows connecting by ipaddress instead of any
other method. Type \\ipaddress in explorer and see if that connects.
John
--
No improvement with the IP address.
Error states in smb.log getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is
not connected.
2008/7/28 John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From Windows the error is: share is not accessible. You might not have
permission to use this network resource. The
Any word on this? Should I open a bug? I've got my foot in my mouth
after telling my group that samba supports DFS :-)
Thanks,
-Brian
Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Jeremy,
Files attached. Let me know if they're not what you need.
Just for fun I tried this with 3.0.28 as well. Same result.
-Brian
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:57:04AM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Any word on this? Should I open a bug? I've got my foot in my mouth
after telling my group that samba supports DFS :-)
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this one. Yes, open up a bug
please and attach the files there, that way more
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this one. Yes, open up a bug
please and attach the files there, that way more than myself
can work on it.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
Ok. Bug 5641 created: Can't use Samba server as DFS host via dfsgui.msc.
Thanks,
-Brian
--
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:16:10PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this one. Yes, open up a bug
please and attach the files there, that way more than myself
can work on it.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
Ok. Bug 5641 created: Can't use Samba
Hi,
I am really trying to get the easiest samba setup working without any luck.
I just want to create a share anyone can access without username/password.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Processing section [homes]
Processing section [printers]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Thomas Vito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am really trying to get the easiest samba setup working without any luck.
I just want to create a share anyone can access without username/password.
The easiest/simplest smb.conf i know how to make:
workgroup =
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Share Definitions
==
[stuff]
path = /stuff
read only = No
guest ok = yes
I forgot to mention, you need to su to root and ~$mkdir /stuff so
Check, if user nobody has at least read access to /home/Guest. If not,
then it must be the reason, why you get an access denied error message (you
cannot access a child directory, if you don't have at least read access to
the parent directory).
Chown the directory /home/Guest as nobody:root or
Jeremy,
Files attached. Let me know if they're not what you need.
Just for fun I tried this with 3.0.28 as well. Same result.
-Brian
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:33:57PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I'm trying to create a DFS root in my 2003 AD domain, and point it
I'm trying to create a DFS root in my 2003 AD domain, and point it to a
share hosted on a Samba server. From the documentation, I had assumed
that this was supported (msdfs host = yes ?). Am I missing something
basic? This is with Samba 3.0.31 on RHEL 5.
When I go to create the DFS root (via
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:33:57PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I'm trying to create a DFS root in my 2003 AD domain, and point it to a
share hosted on a Samba server. From the documentation, I had assumed
that this was supported (msdfs host = yes ?). Am I missing something
basic? This is
: Samba-Liste [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: [Samba] Help needed. Samba 3.2.0rc2 - IDMAP - Windows 2008 Server -
ADS Integration - Winbind
Para: samba samba@lists.samba.org
Data: Sexta-feira, 27 de Junho de 2008, 8:31
Hi,
I read at least 100 different documentations during the
last week and
didn't
Hi,
I read at least 100 different documentations during the last week and
didn't get it. So I decided to ask the list for help :)
Unfortunately we have to move to a Windows 2008 Server ADS in our
company as this is required for some other projects. But we want to
keep our nice 5+ samba-server
[2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525)
Got OID 1 2 840 113554 1 2 2
[2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525)
Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
[2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(528)
Got secblob of size
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:03 -0600, Daniel Baughman wrote:
Folks I'm in a tight spot with users seeing intermittent access to a
critical samba server on my network. Above seems to illustrate the error
best. This line, maybe the most? Suggestions? Any help welcome.
and rejoining the ADS domain did the
trick.
Thanks for your help,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: simo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 10:55 AM
To: Daniel Baughman
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with sudden wierd ticket error.
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10
Hello,
I'm using samba 3.0.24-6etch9 on a Debian stable system. I've received a
vulnerability report from our CERT stating, among others:
Vulnerability: anonymous nullsession exploitable, can list open shares,
can read registry
ToDo: Allow only authenticated users access to shared components
I have the same kind of setup (except I'm using Linux 2.6 IPSEC with KAME
tools, and have two different domains, one on each side), and it almost
work. I can join the domain on the other side of the tunnel (I still have
a problem where wbinfo -t says it cannot find the DC) and winbindd can map
Copied to list. (Forgot to hit 'Reply All'_
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Rob Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can ping each server's IP from the other server. The following nmblookup
commands both work:
Hi, Misty:
The all-important question is not whether you can ping each server's
My network topology is changing. One of my network segments that used to be
hard-wired will now be connecting to the rest of the network through DSL,
with a layer of OpenVPN on top. I am having the hardest time getting any
form of cross-subnet browsing or WINS working.
My PDC is called CORPSRV.
Hello,
I have a Samba PDC chugging away, one of the clients is a Windows 2003
Server machine with Remote Desktop enabled. Regular users can log in to
the 2003 Server just fine *if they are at the actual computer*.
Now, I want people to be able to log on to this machine (authenticated by
the
Hello,
I have a Samba PDC chugging away, one of the clients is a Windows 2003
Server machine with Remote Desktop enabled. Regular users can log in to
the 2003 Server just fine *if they are at the actual computer*.
Now, I want people to be able to log on to this machine (authenticated by
Dear friend,
I am running the linux system and have found some error messages in
the file /var/log/messages
May 4 09:04:36 cnsz030468 kernel: smb_request: result -104, setting invalid
May 4 09:04:36 cnsz030468 kernel: smb_request: result -104, setting invalid
May 4 09:04:36 cnsz030468 kernel:
Yep - which is why I think your bosses are correct. Deploying a *new*
NT4 domain in 2008 is just nuts. When most clients are XP or Vista and
many applications have integration with AD.
You've been brainwashed by M$. It is not nuts to deploy a new Samba
server in 2008. Samba 3.x
Greg J. Zartman, P.E.
Fact is, most of us don't have farms of domain controllers and hundreds
and hundreds of users. Most of us manage small to medium sized networks
that can benefit hugely by the cost savings of deploying Samba instead
of Windows. I'm not talking about just costs of
Yan Seiner wrote:
Greg J. Zartman, P.E.
Fact is, most of us don't have farms of domain controllers and hundreds
and hundreds of users. Most of us manage small to medium sized networks
that can benefit hugely by the cost savings of deploying Samba instead
of Windows. I'm not talking
JJB
Yan Seiner wrote:
Yup. For small-ish networks, nt4 servers are 'good enough'.
Last I checked, MS imposes an artificial limit on its servers, where a
server can only serve its own subnet. Samba doesn't have this limit.
So
a single multi-homed samba server can do the work of several
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, JJB wrote:
As I understand it, you need a WINS server for every subnet - we figured this
out after the fact, so we now have 3 servers running Samba so that everyone
can see all members of the workgroup (we are rolling out the domain slowly -
in the meanwhile, we don't
Now I realize I'll get tarred-n-feather for this, but...
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing
it this way vs the Microsoft way? Have a meeting about it in a short
while...
We
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:08 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Now I realize I'll get tarred-n-feather for this, but...
of course you'll be :-)
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I realize I'll get tarred-n-feather for this, but...
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing
it
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I realize I'll get tarred-n-feather for this, but...
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are
taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good
On 10/04/2008, JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Thanks everyone who posted so far. While we are at it, is Apple's
OpenDirectory a rough equivalent of AD
In some ways, yes.
or is OpenDirectory just
Samba/OpenLDAP compiled on OS X?
No, it's a completely different beast.
--
James Peach |
Hello,
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing
it this way vs the Microsoft way? Have a meeting about it in a short
while...
We wanted to do it because Linux is more secure and more
http://medicine.ucsf.edu/domit
DOM Helpdesk: 415-476-6827
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JJB
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:41 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Help: justification for Linux PDC vs Windows...
Hello,
My
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:40 PM, JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing it
this way vs the Microsoft way? Have a meeting about it in a short while...
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:40 -0700, JJB wrote:
Hello,
My IT department has implemented a samba PDC and now we are taking flack
for it. Can anyone help me out with some good justifications for doing
it this way vs the Microsoft way? Have a meeting about it in a short
while...
We wanted
* samba is - of course - muchmuch cheaper due to the lack of license
costs
This to me makes it more flexible and better performing. I mean i can
design my network how I want and not with restrictive licenses that
force me to a suboptimal configuration.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Hi all!
Im setup Samba (samba-3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4) with CENTOS 5. Im
joined Samba to AD (windows 2003 server) -- OK. Im start Winbindd -- ok
(check status ok). When I type: wbinfo u (or g)
I see errors message: Error looking up domain users, when I check status
Winbind :
I am trying to run the ctdb/tests/run_tests.sh batch file.
I noticed that nodes.txt has the following localhost type ip addresses:
127.0.0.1
127.0.0.2
127.0.0.3
127.0.0.4
and the public addresses has some other addresses:
10.99.99.0/24
10.99.99.1/24
10.99.99.2/24
10.99.99.3/24
I reckon I need
Greetings!!!
I am using samba 3.0.28 clients authenticating AD R2 with SFU 3.5. I
have setup nss info to template, sfu get the uid, gid, home dir and
shell from AD.
The problem is it seems to be working for sometime, and then it says
could not get uid/gid pair. I am assuming some kind of caching
Linux Addict wrote:
Greetings!!!
I am using samba 3.0.28 clients authenticating AD R2 with SFU 3.5. I
have setup nss info to template, sfu get the uid, gid, home dir and
shell from AD.
Whoa, slow down, your getting all ahead of yourself. You seem to need
to pick a user authorization
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Ross S. W. Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Greetings!!!
I am using samba 3.0.28 clients authenticating AD R2 with SFU 3.5. I
have setup nss info to template, sfu get the uid, gid, home dir and
shell from AD.
Whoa, slow
Linux Addict wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Ross S. W. Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Greetings!!!
I am using samba 3.0.28 clients authenticating AD R2 with SFU 3.5. I
have setup nss info to template, sfu get the uid, gid, home dir and
Hi All,
I have already integrated my samba with the Active directory domain
using winbind, but I am trying to do the following. I want to map a UNIX
group ccusers to Active Directory group NICE\ccusers. I need my AD
users that don't have local accounts on my machine to be able to access
5:00 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Help with mapping a UNIX group to a AD Directory Group
Hi All,
I have already integrated my samba with the Active directory domain
using winbind, but I am trying to do the following. I want to map a UNIX
group ccusers to Active Directory group
* Michael Grice [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080109 17:42] wrote:
I am in the middle of migrating a number of applications from one server
to another and I am running into an issue with backslashes on a smbfs
mount. Basically, the backslash can be used in a file path on the old
server and not on the
I am in the middle of migrating a number of applications from one server
to another and I am running into an issue with backslashes on a smbfs
mount. Basically, the backslash can be used in a file path on the old
server and not on the new. This turns out to be important because of the
samba share
How many users do you have?
--
Rune Tønnesen
Venlig Hilsen/Best Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be a smart thing to do, but I had problems with it last time I
tried. It seems that it would randomly stop authenticating people beyond
a certain point in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After that sweep, ~9000. However, that's a slight red herring, as only a
fraction of that number will ever be logged in simultaneously (maybe 100
maximum?). It is an entire campus full of students, but they only log in
via 2 computer labs with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be a smart thing to do, but I had problems with it last time I
tried. It seems that it would randomly stop authenticating people beyond
a certain point in the file. I didn't get a chance to try this again.
In any case, HP will not support
Hi Ryan
Why don't you migrate your smbpasswd file to tdb?
This could be done
pdbedit -i smbpasswd:/etc/samba/smbpasswd -e tdbsam:/etc/samba/smbpasswd.tdb
in smb.conf change passdb backend to
passdb backend = tdbsam:/etc/samba/smbpasswd.tdb
voila
--
Rune Tønnesen
Venlig Hilsen/Best Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Eggleston wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008, Ryan Novosielski might have said:
Can anyone brighter than me think of an easy way to remove MANY users
from an smbpasswd file (I have a list of users that can be removed, some
of which may already be
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008, Ryan Novosielski might have said:
Can anyone brighter than me think of an easy way to remove MANY users
from an smbpasswd file (I have a list of users that can be removed, some
of which may already be missing, some of which may be present)? I cannot
use smbpasswd -x in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anyone brighter than me think of an easy way to remove MANY users
from an smbpasswd file (I have a list of users that can be removed, some
of which may already be missing, some of which may be present)? I cannot
use smbpasswd -x in a loop. Is
On Friday 04 January 2008, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
I cannot
use smbpasswd -x in a loop.
Why not?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mike Eggleston wrote:
I'm aware that you cannot use smbpasswd in a loop creating the
accounts because you have to type in the password
Sure you can.
Example using a variable x for the username and, in this case, setting
the password equal to the username:
echo -e
Hi everyone.
I am used slackware version 12, and kernel version 2.6.23.8.
My samba server verison 3.0.25b.
server running the log.nmbd file recoder the mesage repeatedly like this.
2007/11/29 15:26:01, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(697)
Netbios nameserver version 3.0.27a started.
Copyright
Jimmy wrote:
Hi everyone.
I am used slackware version 12, and kernel version 2.6.23.8.
My samba server verison 3.0.25b.
server running the log.nmbd file recoder the mesage repeatedly like this.
2007/11/29 15:26:01, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(697)
Netbios nameserver version 3.0.27a
Hi colleagues
I am trying to implement security for my network with samba, I am using
poledit, but it has very few choices, I am using nitrobit group policy, but
this needs a serial, and I do not have it.
Someone I can recommend a software like nitrobit to implement security to the
The standard templates that come with poledit are somewhat limited, but
anything that you can configure via the registry can be set by a policy.
There are several useful templates floating around the web, and you can
always make your own.
The other option of course is that if Nitrobit meets
On 11/9/07, Roylan Suarez Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone on this list uses nitrobit policy?
We used to, although we quit using it almost two years ago due to
various reliability problems.
What do you need help with?
Josh Kelley
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
Hello friends
Someone on this list uses nitrobit policy?
--
--
Roylan Suarez Reyes
Admin. Redes JC. Vinales
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telef: 793210
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have cross-compiled smbmount(smbmnt, smbclient) using samba-3.0.24.tar.gz,
then ported them to an ARM Arch machine whose /etc directory is read only.
The smbmount command always results in errors Can't get /etc/mtab~ lock
filesmbmnt failed: 1
Someone says that If we rebuild samba with the
I have Samba 3.0.23c-2 (default that comes with RedHat Enterprise 5
Server) and am trying to tweak the conf file to permit roaming profiles
and assign drive letter mapping.
I am able to join my XP SP2 system to Samba as the PDC, and can log in as
root, but any other account either warns that
On 8/29/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have Samba 3.0.23c-2 (default that comes with RedHat Enterprise 5
Server) and am trying to tweak the conf file to permit roaming profiles
and assign drive letter mapping.
I am able to join my XP SP2 system to Samba as the PDC, and can log
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, John Drescher wrote:
On 8/29/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have Samba 3.0.23c-2 (default that comes with RedHat Enterprise 5
Server) and am trying to tweak the conf file to permit roaming profiles
and assign drive letter mapping.
I am able to join my XP SP2
add user to group script = /ulllsr/sbin/usermod -G %g %u
Although this should not be the cause of your problem, Is this correct?
After logging in to windows do your users have access to their
profile? I mean can they browse \\%N\profiles\%u and change files?
Are they the unix owner of the
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, John Drescher wrote:
add user to group script = /ulllsr/sbin/usermod -G %g %u
Although this should not be the cause of your problem, Is this correct?
No. A stuck key along the way. It has been corrected.
After logging in to windows do your users have access to
Are they the unix owner of the folder containing their profile? Are
you using acls on your unix filesystem?
They are the owner of files created by them.
I'm not sure what you mean by the second part of your question.
Then you are probably not using this.
Have you examined the log files
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, John Drescher wrote:
Are they the unix owner of the folder containing their profile? Are
you using acls on your unix filesystem?
They are the owner of files created by them.
I'm not sure what you mean by the second part of your question.
Then you are probably not using
Phil Burrow wrote:
Bjoern Tore Sund wrote:
No Windows here, this is the cifs disk server for 800 Linux clients.
None of which are members of the domain in any meaningful way. I just
want all the servers to authenticate against the same LDAP server, the
domain is irrelevant for
Phil Burrow wrote:
Bjørn Tore Sund wrote:
I have four SLES 10 servers working as Samba servers on the same domain
with an LDAP account backend. Relevant smb.conf entries are:
[global]
workgroup = UNIX
realm = UNIX.UIB.NO
server string = ukl-samba
Bjoern Tore Sund wrote:
If you do net getlocalsid on each of your SLES machines, the SID
that is returned should be the same for all of them if you want them
all to be controllers on your domain. If it's not, pick the SID you
want - i.e. the sambaSID all your users have in their LDAP records
Phil Burrow wrote:
Bjoern Tore Sund wrote:
If you do net getlocalsid on each of your SLES machines, the SID
that is returned should be the same for all of them if you want them
all to be controllers on your domain. If it's not, pick the SID you
want - i.e. the sambaSID all your users
Adam DiCaprio wrote:
This is on RHE4, I am getting an invalid DN error. Is there a good
resource
site for this type of configuration issue? There is a lot of info
that comes
up through google but I am having no luck finding anything relevant
(or that
seems relevant to me). Thank you in
Bjoern Tore Sund wrote:
No Windows here, this is the cifs disk server for 800 Linux clients.
None of which are members of the domain in any meaningful way. I just
want all the servers to authenticate against the same LDAP server, the
domain is irrelevant for functionality. Hmmm. Which
201 - 300 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
