Thanks for the clarification.
2010/12/29 TAKAHASHI Motonobu
> 2010/12/29 David Roid :
> > Further experiment reveals that if "vfs objects" is removed then "create
> > mask" works. I know vfs_acl_xattr is needed to keep windows ACL here ( I
> > suppose it's step1 ), but why doesn't it honor mask
2010/12/29 David Roid :
> Further experiment reveals that if "vfs objects" is removed then "create
> mask" works. I know vfs_acl_xattr is needed to keep windows ACL here ( I
> suppose it's step1 ), but why doesn't it honor mask options ( step2 and
> step3 )? Or settings in the share above are just
Hello list,
I've got a question from reading Using Samba 3rd, where it puts:
... the final permission is caculated by below filters in the order used by
Samba:
1. Apply any DOS attribute mapping options << I take this as
either map DOS attributes to execute bits, or store DOS attribu
