On 12/01/12 23:02, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Quoting steve :
Samba4's winbind does not support RFC2307, so doing this is pretty
rough. I think you need to either use CIFS + winbind everywhere or
somehow maintain an external idmap.
Yea, it is horrible. We are staring down the barrell of the s
Quoting steve :
Samba4's winbind does not support RFC2307, so doing this is pretty
rough. I think you need to either use CIFS + winbind everywhere or
somehow maintain an external idmap.
Yea, it is horrible. We are staring down the barrell of the same gun.
As Jeremy said, they are discussing w
2011-11-30 18:02 keltezéssel, steve írta:
> On 30/11/11 17:46, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:37 +0100, steve wrote:
>>> On 30/11/11 16:40, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Matthieu,
On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
> Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think
On 30/11/11 17:46, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:37 +0100, steve wrote:
On 30/11/11 16:40, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Matthieu,
On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think I am not alone
with my issue. I think I should be easy to fix
On 30/11/11 17:40, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:37 +0100, steve wrote:
On 30/11/11 16:40, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Matthieu,
On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think I am not alone
with my issue. I think I should be easy to fix
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:37 +0100, steve wrote:
> On 30/11/11 16:40, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> > Matthieu,
> > On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
> >> Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think I am not alone
> >> with my issue. I think I should be easy to fix now before it goes beta.
> > C
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:37 +0100, steve wrote:
> On 30/11/11 16:40, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> > Matthieu,
> > On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
> >> Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think I am not alone
> >> with my issue. I think I should be easy to fix now before it goes beta.
> > C
On 30/11/11 16:40, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Matthieu,
On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think I am not alone
with my issue. I think I should be easy to fix now before it goes beta.
Certainly true, why not trying to start working on solution on your
Matthieu,
On 30/11/2011 08:09, steve wrote:
Yep. I realise the 'alphaness' of Samba 4 but I think I am not alone
with my issue. I think I should be easy to fix now before it goes beta.
Certainly true, why not trying to start working on solution on your own,
by doing the first move you have m
On 30/11/11 07:50, Michael Wood wrote:
On 29 November 2011 21:34, steve wrote:
On 29/11/11 20:20, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and ar
On 29 November 2011 21:34, steve wrote:
> On 29/11/11 20:20, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
>>> LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and are placed in their
>>> nfs'
2011-11-29 21:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
> On 29/11/11 20:34, steve wrote:
>> On 29/11/11 20:20, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP
On 29/11/11 20:34, steve wrote:
On 29/11/11 20:20, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and are placed in their
nfs'd /home folder. The same user
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 08:34:06PM +0100, steve wrote:
> On 29/11/11 20:20, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> >On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
> >>I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
> >>LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and are placed in their
>
On 29/11/11 20:20, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and are placed in their
nfs'd /home folder. The same user can also logon to windows. His r
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:09 +0100, steve wrote:
> I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
> LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and are placed in their
> nfs'd /home folder. The same user can also logon to windows. His roaming
> profile is stored in his /home
I have a LAN of linux and win7 clients currently with Samba 3.6 and
LDAP. Linux users authenticate against LDAP and are placed in their
nfs'd /home folder. The same user can also logon to windows. His roaming
profile is stored in his /home folder. (something like .msprofile_v2)
How do I transf
17 matches
Mail list logo
