> -Original Message-
> From: Volker Lendecke
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 7:01 AM
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:43:52PM -0700, Ian Puleston wrote:
> > And I still need to find why I don't see sid S-1-5-32-544 with any
> > version?
>
> You do have that group as a local group in your
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:43:52PM -0700, Ian Puleston wrote:
> And I still need to find why I don't see sid S-1-5-32-544 with any
> version?
You do have that group as a local group in your
group_mapping.tdb? Please upload a debug level 10 log of all
the versions you tested at least up to the poin
> -Original Message-
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org On Behalf Of Ian Puleston
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:44 PM
> > the problem is that in its access checks smbd is not
> > getting the sid for the Administrators group (S-1-5-32-544).
>
> But if I run the Fedora version of
> -Original Message-
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org On Behalf Of Ian Puleston
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:22 AM
>
> I'm working on bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6592 and
> something that has apparently changed in my setup is preventing me
from
> testing th
Hi,
I'm working on bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6592 and
something that has apparently changed in my setup is preventing me from
testing the final stages of the fix. I have a machine running Samba
server and joined to the domain, and am accessing that from the W2K3
domain server
