On 26.04.2012 22:08, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> I have one share on my samba server which is on top of an autofs mount
> point. This is solaris 10 with bundled samba 3.5.10 and zfs. It also
> shows 0 free space. I had the same problem with samba 3.4.x compiled
> from source code. I think this i
I have one share on my samba server which is on top of an autofs mount
point. This is solaris 10 with bundled samba 3.5.10 and zfs. It also
shows 0 free space. I had the same problem with samba 3.4.x compiled
from source code. I think this is just a fundamental Samba issue that
you won't easi
On 26.04.2012 16:07, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> Are these autofs mounts?
>
> Are the nfs v4 mounts - I think Solaris 10 will automatically default
> to NFS v4 when mounting from another Solaris 10 server.
Yes to both.
> Can you run "smbd -b" on the new and old version and see if the new
> buil
Are these autofs mounts?
Are the nfs v4 mounts - I think Solaris 10 will automatically default
to NFS v4 when mounting from another Solaris 10 server.
Can you run "smbd -b" on the new and old version and see if the new
build omits any crucial modules?
On 04/26/12 06:07, Christian Manal wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running Samba 3.6.4 on Solaris 10 x86. Underlying filesystem is ZFS.
Since updating from 3.6.0, free space on NFS mounted ZFS filesystem,
without a userquota set for the user, is always reported zero. 'quota
-v' and the perl module 'Quota' both report no quota for such file systems.
