A 06:36 29/04/02 -0700, vous avez écrit :
>Can do.. I'll turn off and report in a week if it helps.
>
>I get the impression from this message board that oplocks are a bad idea,
>overall. They are only really good, they say, for serving static files to
>clients. I would turn them off unless you hav
Can do.. I'll turn off and report in a week if it helps.
Thanks,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Pablo Alcaraz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Oplock breaks.
I get the impression from this me
ide. The file is not saved.
> >
> >
> >
> > Should I turn off oplocks altogether?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > *From:* Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 25,
nal Message-
> *From:* Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:39 AM
> *To:* '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> *Subject:* [Samba] Oplock breaks.
>
> (HP-UX 11.0 - smbd version 2.2.3a)
nal Message-
> *From:* Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:39 AM
> *To:* '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> *Subject:* [Samba] Oplock breaks.
>
> (HP-UX 11.0 - smbd version 2.2.3a)
PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 25,
2002 11:39 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [Samba]
Oplock breaks.
(HP-UX 11.0 - smbd version
2.2.3a)
Any
idea what causes this:
[2002/04/25 07:55:21, 0]
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758) oplock_break: receive_smb error
(HP-UX
11.0 - smbd version 2.2.3a)
Any
idea what causes this:
[2002/04/25 07:55:21, 0]
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Error
0) oplock_break failed for file nalco/TMPfpd8cv4jv7.shtml (dev =
4005, inode = 60549, file_id = 2501).[2002/04/25 07:55:21,
