On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01:11AM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Hi Jeremy. Thanks for the reply. Would that mean that it is not
> possible to use the recycle bin in the ADS domain mode?
It's nothing to do with the ADS domain mode, it's to
do with what fileserver backend you're using.
smbd ==
Hi Sebastian,
If you run ps ax | grep smbd while samba is running and see running smbd
processes, then most (probably all even) vfs objects should run (including
recycle).
Ricky
On Feb 22, 2013 4:01 AM, "Sebastian Arcus" wrote:
> On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013
On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
> checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
> Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I file it
> as a bug report - or Samba
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just checked if
I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in Samba 3 - and
it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I file it as a bug report -
or Samba 4 supports/will support this functionality in some other way?
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:50:37AM +0200, S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
> Thank you very much! That was what I needed to know... Now I can stop
> searching and wait for the update to come out...
>
> Any idea when this should be implemented? A few weeks? A few months?
I'd say a few months rather than
Thank you very much! That was what I needed to know... Now I can stop
searching and wait for the update to come out...
Any idea when this should be implemented? A few weeks? A few months?
Thanks again!
On di, 2006-08-15 at 09:42 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:28:38AM
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:28:38AM +0200, S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
> Please take a look at my post below. Especially the part that starts
> with "What I know so far" and "BUT!!!"... Could this be a bug in Samba?
Yes, it is a known bug in Samba that is not easy to fix.
Tridge has figured out how t
Gentlemen, Developers,
Please take a look at my post below. Especially the part that starts
with "What I know so far" and "BUT!!!"... Could this be a bug in Samba?
Please respond...
On ma, 2006-08-14 at 13:04 +0200, S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
> Hi ho there...
>
> Environment: IIS 6.0 with every
Well, I think I partially found out why this is acting strangely. I've
tried this on both samba 2.2.5 and 2.2.6rc4. The file handles work a little
differently between kernel 2.2 and kernel 2.4.
On kernel 2.2, when you access a directory, you get a single CWD open
handle (from LSOF 4.47):
COMMA
Hey all,
I've been fighting a samba share/unmount problem for several days now and may
have found a bug in the connect/disconnect code.
Basically, it seems that while everything claims to free the connection to the
share, it doesn't actually happen. This is me closing ALL windows to the serve
11 matches
Mail list logo
