On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:02:23AM -0700, Jessica Guynn wrote:
> Is there a parameter for smb config for incoming connections to originate
> from ports greater than 1024 (insecure ports)?
smbd doesn't care what port number the incoming connection is
arriving from.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from
Is there a parameter for smb config for incoming connections to originate
from ports greater than 1024 (insecure ports)?
If not, can I set the smb ports like this "smb ports = 1033" in the global
section?
Thanks guys!
-Jessica
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read th
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 19:06 -0300, Marcio Oli wrote:
> Anybody could help me with this entries in my machines logs:
>
> [2012/10/09 14:59:33.092831, 0] lib/util_sock.c:474(read_fd_with_timeout)
> [2012/10/09 14:59:33.093013, 0]
> lib/util_sock.c:1441(get_peer_addr_internal)
> getpeername faile
Anybody could help me with this entries in my machines logs:
[2012/10/09 14:59:33.092831, 0] lib/util_sock.c:474(read_fd_with_timeout)
[2012/10/09 14:59:33.093013, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:1441(get_peer_addr_internal)
getpeername failed. Error was Ponto final de transporte não está
conectado
Am Freitag 05 Juni 2009 23:40:20 schrieb Matt Burkhardt:
> Okay - I've been plugging away and it got to the point that running
> smbclient was returning information about an Alfresco install that I
> never used, so I went ahead and deleted everything I could find on my
> machine that said "alfresco
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Matt Burkhardt wrote:
> Okay - I've been plugging away and it got to the point that running
> smbclient was returning information about an Alfresco install that I
> never used, so I went ahead and deleted everything I could find on my
> machine that said "a
Okay - I've been plugging away and it got to the point that running
smbclient was returning information about an Alfresco install that I
never used, so I went ahead and deleted everything I could find on my
machine that said "alfresco". I then removed samba using apt-get from
the machine by typing
The log files gave messages suggesting firewall problems, but there is
no firewall. NMAP showed both samba ports closed, but open again after a
reboot. A restart of Samba causes the ports to close again leading to
the error messages mentioned previously.
Samba is set up as a standalone server
Shaun Marolf wrote:
Okay my smb.conf file is correct. Firewall is configured correctly to allow
Samba on local network. smbd and nmbd are running. Her computer still cannot
connect to my printer share. I read my Samba version wrong its actually
3.0.23a-1.fc5.1, here is my smb.conf:
[global]
Okay my smb.conf file is correct. Firewall is configured correctly to allow
Samba on local network. smbd and nmbd are running. Her computer still cannot
connect to my printer share. I read my Samba version wrong its actually
3.0.23a-1.fc5.1, here is my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = HOM
The output of:
cat /etc/services | grep -i bios
netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udp
netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service
netbios-dgm 138/udp
netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBI
Hi All,
I finally got a completely new box (Multiple Domains Thread from last month)
and have just done a fresh FreeBSD 4.7 install.
I used to use a source tarball, but am wondering if there's any reason to
not use the ports tree.
TIA
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following U
Hi Walter,
139/TCP - Netbios-ssn for samba,
901/TCP - Swat - (If you are using SWAT).
Good Day,
Jason Stewart
At 11:32 AM 6/3/2002 -0700, Walter Weiss wrote:
>Is there a list somewhere of every port a linux box running redhat 7.1
>uses or might use for the samba services? I need to set up my
Walter,
# grep netbios /etc/services
netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udp
netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service
netbios-dgm 138/udp
netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBIOS session
Is there a list somewhere of every port a linux box
running redhat 7.1 uses or might use for the samba services? I need to set
up my router to be able to access samba from another port but I"m not sure which
ones to forward.
THanks,
Walter Weiss
gt; > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:55:56PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Barry Smoke wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it possible to map a drive to a samba share over the internet,
> > > > through an isp that blocks the samba ports... I
t; Is it possible to map a drive to a samba share over the internet,
> > > through an isp that blocks the samba ports... I know with samba, I can
> > > specify a port, but what about a windows client? Can I change what port
> > > a windows machine looks to for samba/smb f
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:55:56PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Barry Smoke wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to map a drive to a samba share over the internet,
> > through an isp that blocks the samba ports... I know with samba, I can
> > specify a port,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Barry Smoke wrote:
> Is it possible to map a drive to a samba share over the internet,
> through an isp that blocks the samba ports... I know with samba, I can
> specify a port, but what about a windows client? Can I change what port
> a windows machine looks
Is it possible to map a drive to a samba share over the internet,
through an isp that blocks the samba ports...
I know with samba, I can specify a port, but what about a windows
client?
Can I change what port a windows machine looks to for samba/smb for a
particular share only?
Barry Smoke
20 matches
Mail list logo
