I am trying to set up a basic Samba server and configure it so that
folders under a share cannot be deleted accidentally by a user. The
ideal scenario would be to have the top-level folders under the share
non-deleteable, but folders and files are able to be created under it.
I cannot find any ea
@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Preventing deletion of folders under a SAMBA share
I am trying to set up a basic Samba server and configure it so that folders
under a share cannot be deleted accidentally by a user. The ideal scenario
would be to have the top-level folders under the share non
to see.
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Steve Simeonidis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 February 2005 22:32
To: Stuart Callender; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Preventing deletion of folders under a SAMBA share
You should be able to do it by manually applying Unix permissio
Stuart Callender:
> Thanks for the reply. I thought this too, but no matter what
> permissions I give for existing folders via Unix permissions (even tried
> sticky bits), or via the directory mask and force directory mode, the
> folders can still be deleted.
>
> Windows 2000 sees the folders as
Stuart Callender:
Thanks for the reply. I thought this too, but no matter what
permissions I give for existing folders via Unix permissions (even tried
sticky bits), or via the directory mask and force directory mode, the
folders can still be deleted.
the folder can be deleted if *the parent* fo
Thanks for this. Yes this does work nicely, however the main reason
things weren't going to plan was quite simple. I had set force user =
root, in an attempt to ensure that all new folders were owned by root -
silly I know, but somehow overlooked, and was forcing each user to be
connected as root
Stuart,
Please would you document what you did to make this work. I'd like to
supplement the additions I made yesterday to the "File, Directory and Share
Access Controls" Chapter of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.
Thanks.
- John T.
On Saturday 05 February 2005 02:18, Stuart Callender wrote:
> Tha
