[Samba] Question about the difference samba3x and samba 3.x

2012-07-25 Thread Anthony Boccia
Hello All, I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba 3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The PDC OS is RHEL and i am using RHEL 6 upstream packages for samba. My question is,

Re: [Samba] Question about the difference samba3x and samba 3.x

2012-07-25 Thread Alberto Moreno
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Anthony Boccia aboc...@afilias.info wrote: Hello All, I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba 3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The

Re: [Samba] Question about the difference samba3x and samba 3.x

2012-07-25 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
On 25/07/12 15:39, Anthony Boccia wrote: Hello All, I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba 3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The PDC OS is RHEL and i am using RHEL 6

Re: [Samba] Question about the difference samba3x and samba 3.x

2012-07-25 Thread Heather Choi
samba3x is essentially anything beyond the original Samba 3.0 packages. However, the fact they didn't bump samba3x is actually not true. Redhat started doing this with RHEL5.4 as a technology preview with Samba 3.3: