Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-12-04 Thread Tom Schaefer
My feeling is that yes it has something to do with the resource fork files since you are right, thats what is different when copying files through the Finder vs. the terminal. But I've already barked up that tree as you put it. There was a guy in the newsgroups who was intentionally vetoing

Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-12-04 Thread Tom Schaefer
, codepages, all that bundle of fun, I could see that perhaps being a problem, I'm going to dig into that. Thanks, Tom On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:29:58 -0600 Philip Edelbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients What happens w/ 3.0? You get permission

RE: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-12-03 Thread William Enestvedt
Is this related to handling of files with resource forks? Manipulating files in Terminal, IIRC, ignores the resource fork -- but Finder actions (like dragging a folder to upload it) include those resources. You might try barking up this tree. :7) (Sorry I can't make any concrete

Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-12-03 Thread Philip Edelbrock
That could be true. If you veto 'dot' files in smb.conf, then you would get strange permission errors from OS-X clients. OS-X wants to put ._filename files (AppleDouble versions of the resource forks) and .DS_Store files (containing some file metadata like Finder comments) on the server. If

Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-12-03 Thread Tom Schaefer
Welcome to the club. Yes, I experience that exact same issue with Mac OS 10.2.x and like you was waiting for 10.3 which I got to try for the first time today. Like you it didn't fix anything. Its crazy. As you say everything works fine if you drop to a shell prompt you can do all the cp -r,

Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-12-03 Thread Tom Schaefer
Welcome to the club. Yes, I experience that exact same issue with Mac OS 10.2.x and like you was waiting for 10.3 which I got to try for the first time today. Like you it didn't fix anything. Its crazy. As you say everything works fine if you drop to a shell prompt you can do all the cp -r,

Re: [Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-11-06 Thread Jinn Koriech
Been having very similar problems on RedHad-7.3 with Samba 2.2.7-3.7.3. Currently users can create folders, but they can't copy files. An entry is created for the file on the server, but no data ever gets transfered. I've found that if you manipulate the files from the Terminal there is no

[Samba] RH 9, Samba 2.2.8 and Mac OS X Clients

2003-10-21 Thread Götz Reinicke
Hi, we run a RH9 samba 2.2.8 ext3 Server and have some problems with MacOS X Clients: They aren't allowed to write directories containing files to any of our shares. I connect to the sambaserver with smb://servername/sharename and a samba user. This user is allowed to create new folders and