On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Volker Lendecke
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:48:09PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Can you publish the actual SRPM built for RHEL 5, or explain how you
>> were able to compile this package for RHEL 5?
>
> All I can say at this moment is that according
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Björn Jacke wrote:
> On 2010-04-14 at 18:48 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia sent off:
>> Can you publish the actual SRPM built for RHEL 5, or explain how you
>> were able to compile this package for RHEL 5?
>
> that SRPM that Volker mentioned is the correct SRPM. There is
On 2010-04-14 at 18:48 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia sent off:
> Can you publish the actual SRPM built for RHEL 5, or explain how you
> were able to compile this package for RHEL 5?
that SRPM that Volker mentioned is the correct SRPM. There is no different
SRPM. The fact that you see a different distrib
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:48:09PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Volker Lendecke
> > wrote:
>
> >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/src/rpm/samba3-3.5.2-43.suse91.src.rpm
> >>
> >> Odd name to bu
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Volker Lendecke
> wrote:
>> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/src/rpm/samba3-3.5.2-43.suse91.src.rpm
>>
>> Odd name to build on CentOS, but we build all RPMs from a
>> single source RPM and pick one to
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Volker Lendecke
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:40:38PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Oguz Yilmaz
>> wrote:
>> > Check for precompiled rpms if it is appropriate for you.
>> >
>> > rpms fr Centos 5 isTested in Centos 5.4
>
http://www.sernet.de/de/samba/
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
>> Check for precompiled rpms if it is appropriate for you.
>>
>> rpms fr Centos 5 isTested in Centos 5.4
>>
>> http://enterprisesamba.com/index.php?id=6
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:40:38PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> > Check for precompiled rpms if it is appropriate for you.
> >
> > rpms fr Centos 5 isTested in Centos 5.4
> >
> > http://enterprisesamba.com/index.php?id=65
> > http://ftp.se
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> Check for precompiled rpms if it is appropriate for you.
>
> rpms fr Centos 5 isTested in Centos 5.4
>
> http://enterprisesamba.com/index.php?id=65
> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/
> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/centos/5/i386/
>
> If you
Check for precompiled rpms if it is appropriate for you.
rpms fr Centos 5 isTested in Centos 5.4
http://enterprisesamba.com/index.php?id=65
http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/
http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/centos/5/i386/
If you need SRPMS check new RHEL 5.5 SRPMS.
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/l
There have been various reports of the difficulties compiling Samba
3.5.x on RHEL 5 and other older operating systems, due to the failure
to correctly load the 'termcap' libraries. The issue is described in
various sources as involving the automaticlaly included GCC option:
'--as-needed' failes to
11 matches
Mail list logo
