--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:43:53AM -0700, Chris de
> Vidal wrote:
>
> > OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only
> turned
> > them off, made no other changes, and have no more
> > corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't
> that be
> > a priority 1, "drop
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:43:53AM -0700, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only turned
> them off, made no other changes, and have no more
> corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't that be
> a priority 1, "drop everything" bug? Other experience
> was confi
