[sorry - bit of a belated reply - I have a bit of a backlog to read]
On 23rd.Oct.2002, Linda Walsh asked :
I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
came w/samba 2.2.5.
A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ _nmb_ to 2
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing?
It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some
circumstances that's what you would want.
Hmmm, I recently developed a script for starting smbd and nmbd under
RedHat, but perhaps
Hi all,
let me quote from /usr/share/doc/packages/samba/README.SuSE:
Splitted init scripts
-
With version 2.2.5 Samba's init scripts have been reorganized. The smb
script is split up into smb (for starting the smbd) and nmb (for starting
nmbd). So far the two services could
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing?
It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some
circumstances that's what you would want.
Hmmm, I recently developed a script for starting smbd and nmbd under
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing?
It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some
circumstances that's what you would want.
Hmmm, I recently developed a script for starting smbd and nmbd under
RedHat, but perhaps
[samba-technical has been removed from addresses because
it's for discussing source code.]
l. a. walsh wrote:
I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
came w/samba 2.2.5.
A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ _nmb_ to
So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing?
It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some
circumstances that's what you would want.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
